Multiple Quantitative Trait Analysis Using Bayesian Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Models for genome-wide prediction and association studies usually target a single phenotypic trait. However, in animal and plant genetics it is common to record information on multiple phenotypes for each individual that will be genotyped. Modeling traits individually disregards the fact that they are most likely associated due to pleiotropy and shared biological basis, thus providing only a partial, confounded view of genetic effects and phenotypic interactions. In this paper we use data from a Multiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC) winter wheat population to explore Bayesian networks as a convenient and interpretable framework for the simultaneous modeling of multiple quantitative traits. We show that they are equivalent to multivariate genetic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), and that they are competitive with single-trait elastic net and single-trait GBLUP in predictive performance. Finally, we discuss their relationship with other additive-effects models and their advantages in inference and interpretation. MAGIC populations provide an ideal setting for this kind of investigation because the very low population structure and large sample size result in predictive models with good power and limited confounding due to relatedness.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2022Causal inference in drug discovery and developmentcited by 6
- 2023Mitigating Prior Errors in Causal Structure Learning: A Resilient Approach via Bayesian Networkscited by 5
- 2025GreenHyperSpectra: A multi-source hyperspectral dataset for global vegetation trait predictioncited by 4
- 2023Learned Causal Method Predictioncited by 3
- 2021Learning Sparse Fixed-Structure Gaussian Bayesian Networkscited by 2
- 2025Score-informed Neural Operator for Enhancing Ordering-based Causal Discoverycited by 2
- 2025Benchmarking Constraint-Based Bayesian Structure Learning Algorithms: Role of Network Topologycited by 1
- 2026Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discoverycited by 1
- 2026Causal Discovery for Cross-Sectional Data Based on Super-Structure and Divide-and-Conquercited by 0
- 2026Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery1 Jun 2026
- 2026Causal Discovery for Cross-Sectional Data Based on Super-Structure and Divide-and-Conquer3 Feb 2026
- 2025Score-informed Neural Operator for Enhancing Ordering-based Causal Discovery18 Aug 2025
- 2025GreenHyperSpectra: A multi-source hyperspectral dataset for global vegetation trait prediction9 Jul 2025
- 2025Benchmarking Constraint-Based Bayesian Structure Learning Algorithms: Role of Network Topology2 Jan 2025
- 2023Learned Causal Method Prediction7 Nov 2023
- 2023Mitigating Prior Errors in Causal Structure Learning: A Resilient Approach via Bayesian Networks12 Jun 2023
- 2022Causal inference in drug discovery and development29 Sep 2022
- 2021Learning Sparse Fixed-Structure Gaussian Bayesian Networks22 Jul 2021