mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Layout decomposition for triple patterning lithography

arXiv 1402.2459 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2014cs.ARcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As minimum feature size and pitch spacing further decrease, triple patterning lithography (TPL) is a possible 193nm extension along the paradigm of double patterning lithography (DPL). However, there is very little study on TPL layout decomposition. In this paper, we show that TPL layout decomposition is a more difficult problem than that for DPL. We then propose a general integer linear programming formulation for TPL layout decomposition which can simultaneously minimize conflict and stitch numbers. Since ILP has very poor scalability, we propose three acceleration techniques without sacrificing solution quality: independent component computation, layout graph simplification, and bridge computation. For very dense layouts, even with these speedup techniques, ILP formulation may still be too slow. Therefore, we propose a novel vector programming formulation for TPL decomposition, and solve it through effective semidefinite programming (SDP) approximation. Experimental results show that the ILP with acceleration techniques can reduce 82% runtime compared to the baseline ILP. Using SDP based algorithm, the runtime can be further reduced by 42% with some tradeoff in the stitch number (reduced by 7%) and the conflict (9% more). However, for very dense layouts, SDP based algorithm can achieve 140x speed-up even compared with accelerated ILP.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.