Want a Good Answer? Ask a Good Question First!
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Community Question Answering (CQA) websites have become valuable repositories which host a massive volume of human knowledge. To maximize the utility of such knowledge, it is essential to evaluate the quality of an existing question or answer, especially soon after it is posted on the CQA website. In this paper, we study the problem of inferring the quality of questions and answers through a case study of a software CQA (Stack Overflow). Our key finding is that the quality of an answer is strongly positively correlated with that of its question. Armed with this observation, we propose a family of algorithms to jointly predict the quality of questions and answers, for both quantifying numerical quality scores and differentiating the high-quality questions/answers from those of low quality. We conduct extensive experimental evaluations to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our methods.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022ELQA: A Corpus of Metalinguistic Questions and Answers about English1 May 2022
- 2021On the Feasibility of Predicting Questions being Forgotten in Stack Overflow29 Oct 2021
- 2021Improving Stack Overflow question title generation with copying enhanced CodeBERT model and bi-modal information27 Sep 2021