Lemma Mining over HOL Light
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large formal mathematical libraries consist of millions of atomic inference steps that give rise to a corresponding number of proved statements (lemmas). Analogously to the informal mathematical practice, only a tiny fraction of such statements is named and re-used in later proofs by formal mathematicians. In this work, we suggest and implement criteria defining the estimated usefulness of the HOL Light lemmas for proving further theorems. We use these criteria to mine the large inference graph of all lemmas in the core HOL Light library, adding thousands of the best lemmas to the pool of named statements that can be re-used in later proofs. The usefulness of the new lemmas is then evaluated by comparing the performance of automated proving of the core HOL Light theorems with and without such added lemmas.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Formal Mathematical Reasoning: A New Frontier in AIcited by 81
- 2022Peano: Learning Formal Mathematical Reasoningcited by 15
- 2021JEFL: Joint Embedding of Formal Proof Librariescited by 0
- 2024Formal Mathematical Reasoning: A New Frontier in AI20 Dec 2024
- 2022Peano: Learning Formal Mathematical Reasoning29 Nov 2022
- 2021JEFL: Joint Embedding of Formal Proof Libraries21 Jul 2021