False discovery rate regression: an application to neural synchrony detection in primary visual cortex
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many approaches for multiple testing begin with the assumption that all tests in a given study should be combined into a global false-discovery-rate analysis. But this may be inappropriate for many of today's large-scale screening problems, where auxiliary information about each test is often available, and where a combined analysis can lead to poorly calibrated error rates within different subsets of the experiment. To address this issue, we introduce an approach called false-discovery-rate regression that directly uses this auxiliary information to inform the outcome of each test. The method can be motivated by a two-groups model in which covariates are allowed to influence the local false discovery rate, or equivalently, the posterior probability that a given observation is a signal. This poses many subtle issues at the interface between inference and computation, and we investigate several variations of the overall approach. Simulation evidence suggests that: (1) when covariate effects are present, FDR regression improves power for a fixed false-discovery rate; and (2) when covariate effects are absent, the method is robust, in the sense that it does not lead to inflated error rates. We apply the method to neural recordings from primary visual cortex. The goal is to detect pairs of neurons that exhibit fine-time-scale interactions, in the sense that they fire together more often than expected due to chance. Our method detects roughly 50% more synchronous pairs versus a standard FDR-controlling analysis. The companion R package FDRreg implements all methods described in the paper.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024DeepLINK-T: deep learning inference for time series data using knockoffs and LSTMcited by 2
- 2021NeurT-FDR: Controlling FDR by Incorporating Feature Hierarchycited by 1
- 2021Multiple Hypothesis Testing Framework for Spatial Signalscited by 1
- 2025Treatment response as a latent variablecited by 1
- 2021AdaPT-GMM: Powerful and robust covariate-assisted multiple testingcited by 0
- 2022Probabilistic Model Incorporating Auxiliary Covariates to Control FDRcited by 0
- 2025Treatment response as a latent variable12 Feb 2025
- 2024DeepLINK-T: deep learning inference for time series data using knockoffs and LSTM5 Apr 2024
- 2022Probabilistic Model Incorporating Auxiliary Covariates to Control FDR6 Oct 2022
- 2021Multiple Hypothesis Testing Framework for Spatial Signals27 Aug 2021
- 2021AdaPT-GMM: Powerful and robust covariate-assisted multiple testing30 Jun 2021
- 2021NeurT-FDR: Controlling FDR by Incorporating Feature Hierarchy24 Jan 2021