Boosting with the Logistic Loss is Consistent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This manuscript provides optimization guarantees, generalization bounds, and statistical consistency results for AdaBoost variants which replace the exponential loss with the logistic and similar losses (specifically, twice differentiable convex losses which are Lipschitz and tend to zero on one side). The heart of the analysis is to show that, in lieu of explicit regularization and constraints, the structure of the problem is fairly rigidly controlled by the source distribution itself. The first control of this type is in the separable case, where a distribution-dependent relaxed weak learning rate induces speedy convergence with high probability over any sample. Otherwise, in the nonseparable case, the convex surrogate risk itself exhibits distribution-dependent levels of curvature, and consequently the algorithm's output has small norm with high probability.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 May 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2.
3 papers.
- 2021Early-stopped neural networks are consistentcited by 34
- 2023Boosting with Tempered Exponential Measurescited by 8
- 2023Smoothly Giving up: Robustness for Simple Modelscited by 0
- 2023Boosting with Tempered Exponential Measures8 Jun 2023
- 2023Smoothly Giving up: Robustness for Simple Models17 Feb 2023
- 2021Early-stopped neural networks are consistent10 Jun 2021