Separating the Real from the Synthetic: Minutiae Histograms as Fingerprints of Fingerprints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this study we show that by the current state-of-the-art synthetically generated fingerprints can easily be discriminated from real fingerprints. We propose a method based on second order extended minutiae histograms (MHs) which can distinguish between real and synthetic prints with very high accuracy. MHs provide a fixed-length feature vector for a fingerprint which are invariant under rotation and translation. This 'test of realness' can be applied to synthetic fingerprints produced by any method. In this work, tests are conducted on the 12 publicly available databases of FVC2000, FVC2002 and FVC2004 which are well established benchmarks for evaluating the performance of fingerprint recognition algorithms; 3 of these 12 databases consist of artificial fingerprints generated by the SFinGe software. Additionally, we evaluate the discriminative performance on a database of synthetic fingerprints generated by the software of Bicz versus real fingerprint images. We conclude with suggestions for the improvement of synthetic fingerprint generation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3.
4 papers.
- 2022PrintsGAN: Synthetic Fingerprint Generatorcited by 30
- 2022Synthetic Data in Human Analysis: A Surveycited by 28
- 2021High Fidelity Fingerprint Generation: Quality, Uniqueness, and Privacycited by 14
- 2022Synthesis and Reconstruction of Fingerprints using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 7
- 2022Synthetic Data in Human Analysis: A Survey19 Aug 2022
- 2022Synthesis and Reconstruction of Fingerprints using Generative Adversarial Networks17 Jan 2022
- 2022PrintsGAN: Synthetic Fingerprint Generator10 Jan 2022
- 2021High Fidelity Fingerprint Generation: Quality, Uniqueness, and Privacy21 May 2021