Greedy Feature Selection for Subspace Clustering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Unions of subspaces provide a powerful generalization to linear subspace models for collections of high-dimensional data. To learn a union of subspaces from a collection of data, sets of signals in the collection that belong to the same subspace must be identified in order to obtain accurate estimates of the subspace structures present in the data. Recently, sparse recovery methods have been shown to provide a provable and robust strategy for exact feature selection (EFS)--recovering subsets of points from the ensemble that live in the same subspace. In parallel with recent studies of EFS with L1-minimization, in this paper, we develop sufficient conditions for EFS with a greedy method for sparse signal recovery known as orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP). Following our analysis, we provide an empirical study of feature selection strategies for signals living on unions of subspaces and characterize the gap between sparse recovery methods and nearest neighbor (NN)-based approaches. In particular, we demonstrate that sparse recovery methods provide significant advantages over NN methods and the gap between the two approaches is particularly pronounced when the sampling of subspaces in the dataset is sparse. Our results suggest that OMP may be employed to reliably recover exact feature sets in a number of regimes where NN approaches fail to reveal the subspace membership of points in the ensemble.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Learning a Self-Expressive Network for Subspace Clusteringcited by 24
- 2022Convergence and Recovery Guarantees of the K-Subspaces Method for Subspace Clusteringcited by 9
- 2021Avengers Ensemble! Improving Transferability of Authorship Obfuscationcited by 8
- 2021Detecting adversaries in Crowdsourcingcited by 1
- 2021PMSSC: Parallelizable multi-subset based self-expressive model for subspace clusteringcited by 1
- 2022Greedier is Better: Selecting Multiple Neighbors per Iteration for Sparse Subspace Clusteringcited by 1
- 2024Contrastive Learning Subspace for Text Clusteringcited by 1
- 2021Neural Ordinary Differential Equation Model for Evolutionary Subspace Clustering and Its Applicationscited by 0
- 2022Provable Clustering of a Union of Linear Manifolds Using Optimal Directionscited by 0
- 2022Noisy ℓ0-Sparse Subspace Clustering on Dimensionality Reduced Datacited by 0
- 2023Sketching for Convex and Nonconvex Regularized Least Squares with Sharp Guaranteescited by 0
- 2024Contrastive Learning Subspace for Text Clustering26 Aug 2024
- 2023Sketching for Convex and Nonconvex Regularized Least Squares with Sharp Guarantees3 Nov 2023
- 2022Noisy ℓ0-Sparse Subspace Clustering on Dimensionality Reduced Data22 Jun 2022
- 2022Convergence and Recovery Guarantees of the K-Subspaces Method for Subspace Clustering11 Jun 2022
- 2022Greedier is Better: Selecting Multiple Neighbors per Iteration for Sparse Subspace Clustering6 Apr 2022
- 2022Provable Clustering of a Union of Linear Manifolds Using Optimal Directions8 Jan 2022
- 2021PMSSC: Parallelizable multi-subset based self-expressive model for subspace clustering24 Nov 2021
- 2021Learning a Self-Expressive Network for Subspace Clustering8 Oct 2021
- 2021Detecting adversaries in Crowdsourcing7 Oct 2021
- 2021Avengers Ensemble! Improving Transferability of Authorship Obfuscation15 Sep 2021
- 2021Neural Ordinary Differential Equation Model for Evolutionary Subspace Clustering and Its Applications22 Jul 2021