mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A significance test for the lasso

arXiv 1301.7161 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2013math.ST stat.ME stat.THcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the sparse linear regression setting, we consider testing the significance of the predictor variable that enters the current lasso model, in the sequence of models visited along the lasso solution path. We propose a simple test statistic based on lasso fitted values, called the covariance test statistic, and show that when the true model is linear, this statistic has an operatorname Exp(1) asymptotic distribution under the null hypothesis (the null being that all truly active variables are contained in the current lasso model). Our proof of this result for the special case of the first predictor to enter the model (i.e., testing for a single significant predictor variable against the global null) requires only weak assumptions on the predictor matrix X. On the other hand, our proof for a general step in the lasso path places further technical assumptions on X and the generative model, but still allows for the important high-dimensional case p>n, and does not necessarily require that the current lasso model achieves perfect recovery of the truly active variables. Of course, for testing the significance of an additional variable between two nested linear models, one typically uses the chi-squared test, comparing the drop in residual sum of squares (RSS) to a chi21 distribution. But when this additional variable is not fixed, and has been chosen adaptively or greedily, this test is no longer appropriate: adaptivity makes the drop in RSS stochastically much larger than chi21 under the null hypothesis. Our analysis explicitly accounts for adaptivity, as it must, since the lasso builds an adaptive sequence of linear models as the tuning parameter λ decreases. In this analysis, shrinkage plays a key role: though additional variables are chosen adaptively, the coefficients of lasso active variables are shrunken due to the ℓ1 penalty. Therefore, the test statistic (which is based on lasso fitted values) is in a sense balanced by these two opposing properties - adaptivity and shrinkage - and its null distribution is tractable and asymptotically operatorname Exp(1).

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021More Powerful Conditional Selective Inference for Generalized Lasso by Parametric Programmingcited by 24
  2. 2021Conditional Selective Inference for Robust Regression and Outlier Detection using Piecewise-Linear Homotopy Continuationcited by 16
  3. 2021The Terminating-Random Experiments Selector: Fast High-Dimensional Variable Selection with False Discovery Rate Controlcited by 10
  4. 2022Mapping the landscape of histomorphological cancer phenotypes using self-supervised learning on unlabeled, unannotated pathology slidescited by 3
  5. 2023Quantum Algorithms for the Pathwise Lassocited by 2
  6. 2021Spatially relaxed inference on high-dimensional linear modelscited by 1
  7. 2022Two-Stage Robust and Sparse Distributed Statistical Inference for Large-Scale Datacited by 1
  8. 2023Bounded P-values in Parametric Programming-based Selective Inferencecited by 1
  9. 2021Weak Signals in the Mobility Landscape: Car Sharing in Ten European Citiescited by 0
  10. 2022Adaptive Noisy Data Augmentation for Regularized Estimation and Inference in Generalized Linear Modelscited by 0
  11. 2022On confidence intervals for precision matrices and the eigendecomposition of covariance matricescited by 0
  12. 2022Simple and Scalable Algorithms for Cluster-Aware Precision Medicinecited by 0
8 more
  1. 2023A parametric distribution for exact post-selection inference with data carvingcited by 0
  2. 2023Sparsified Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for High-Dimensional Linear Modelscited by 0
  3. 2024Predictive Performance Test based on the Exhaustive Nested Cross-Validation for High-dimensional datacited by 0
  4. 2025Statistically Testing Training Data for Unwanted Error Patterns using Rule-Oriented Regressioncited by 0
  5. 2025Spacing Test for Fused Lassocited by 0
  6. 2025φ-Table: A Statistical Explanation for Global SHAPcited by 0
  7. 2026New explanations and inference for least angle regressioncited by 0
  8. 2026Post-Anomaly Detection Inference for Deep SVDDcited by 0