mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Equitability Analysis of the Maximal Information Coefficient, with Comparisons

arXiv 1301.6314 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2013cs.LG q-bio.QM stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A measure of dependence is said to be equitable if it gives similar scores to equally noisy relationships of different types. Equitability is important in data exploration when the goal is to identify a relatively small set of strongest associations within a dataset as opposed to finding as many non-zero associations as possible, which often are too many to sift through. Thus an equitable statistic, such as the maximal information coefficient (MIC), can be useful for analyzing high-dimensional data sets. Here, we explore both equitability and the properties of MIC, and discuss several aspects of the theory and practice of MIC. We begin by presenting an intuition behind the equitability of MIC through the exploration of the maximization and normalization steps in its definition. We then examine the speed and optimality of the approximation algorithm used to compute MIC, and suggest some directions for improving both. Finally, we demonstrate in a range of noise models and sample sizes that MIC is more equitable than natural alternatives, such as mutual information estimation and distance correlation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.