# Doc2Harness: Benchmarking LLMs on Long-Horizon Harness Engineering of Coding Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20344 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.20344/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 35 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16941/) (2025)
- [Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24653/) (2026)
- [A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13334/) (2025)
- [SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn 1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12115/) (2025)
- [NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.12730/) (2025)
- [ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03546/) (2026)
- [Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27922/) (2026)
- [Commit0: Library Generation from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01769/) (2024)
- [DeepSWE: Measuring Frontier Coding Agents on Original, Long-Horizon Engineering Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07946/) (2026)
- [Rethinking the Evaluation of Harness Evolution for Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.12227/) (2026)
- [A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12399/) (2025)
- [Doc2Feat-Bench: Evaluating Documentation-Driven Feature Addition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18130/) (2025)
- [RepoZero: Can LLMs Generate a Code Repository from Scratch?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07122/) (2026)
- [HarnessDev: Can LLMs Create and Evolve Their Own Agent Harness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01437/) (2026)
- [From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20683/) (2026)
- [Auditing Agent Harness Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14271/) (2026)
- [Evo-Bench: Can Language Models Improve Agent Harness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09096/) (2026)
- [Skill-Use: Can LLMs Actually Use Skills in Agentic Harnesses?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04828/) (2026)
- [HarnessOpt-Bench: Evaluating LLMs at Harness Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06301/) (2026)
- [Claw-SWE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating OpenClaw-style Agent Harnesses on Coding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12344/) (2026)
- [What makes a harness a harness: necessary and sufficient conditions for an agent harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10106/) (2026)
- [Harness Engineering: Anatomy, Architecture, and Evolution of Coding Agents -- A Source-Code Study of Eleven Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00006/) (2026)
- [Harness-IF: Evaluating Instruction Following Across Instruction Surfaces in Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11727/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agents driven by large language models are increasingly deployed on long-horizon tasks, where they use tools and modify real workspaces. How well they perform depends as much on the harness around the model as on the model itself. Existing benchmarks measure downstream task success under a fixed harness, leaving harness engineering itself unexplored. We propose Doc2Harness, a two-stage benchmark that evaluates long-horizon harness engineering directly. In Stage 1, a build model operating inside a fixed builder harness receives an interface-only contract skeleton and a development document that consolidates behavior across twelve frontier harnesses, and then constructs a complete candidate harness in an isolated container. In Stage 2, the frozen candidate harness runs in containers separate from the construction environment, one per test case, and is driven end to end by a scripted mock model. We score each test case using four observable channels, namely the requests sent to the model, the files on disk, the process exit code, and the command output; positive controls rule out vacuous passes. Across nineteen frontier models, each evaluated with three independent builds on 328 test cases, GPT-6 Astra achieves the highest pass rate at 53.05%, while the weakest model reaches 27.44%, a gap of roughly twenty-six percentage points. Even the strongest model fails nearly half of the test cases, and failures cluster around how cross-cutting functionality is split across modules. To our knowledge, Doc2Harness provides the first deterministic benchmark for measuring long-horizon harness engineering.