# A Strong Harness Narrows the Model Gap: A Comparative Evaluation for Legislative Document-to-XML Conversion

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19999 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19999/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13418/) (2023)
- [Image-based table recognition: data, model, and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10683/) (2019)
- [CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06268/) (2021)
- [Grammar-Constrained Decoding for Structured NLP Tasks without Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13971/) (2023)
- [General OCR Theory: Towards OCR-2.0 via a Unified End-to-end Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01704/) (2024)
- [OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07626/) (2024)
- [Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27922/) (2026)
- [Stop Comparing LLM Agents Without Disclosing the Harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23950/) (2026)
- [ParseBench: A Document Parsing Benchmark for AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08538/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Legal-content reproduction requires matching the source exactly in section hierarchy, verbatim text, citations, and amendment spans; a dropped citation or mislabeled amendment carries into the products lawyers rely on. We report an industrial pipeline converting U.S. state legislation into strict, schema-constrained XML, and hypothesize that its accuracy comes from harness engineering, the deterministic tooling built around a model, more than the model itself. Our controlled ablation crosses three harnesses (zero-shot, a single tool-using agent, and a decomposed multi-agent pipeline) with three Claude models on 153 gold bills from two jurisdictions. The harness narrows the model gap: the weakest model in the full pipeline beats the strongest model alone (0.948 versus 0.806, paired bootstrap p less than 0.001). Because the two agentic harnesses share identical tools, their gap comes from orchestration: decomposition plus the persisted state and per-agent context it brings. Across four scored dimensions, the model spread at zero-shot (0.68 to 0.81) narrows to 0.95 at the full pipeline; the residual sits almost entirely in citation normalization, where the canonical identifier is retrieved from an external authority rather than generated from the weights, so a deterministic lookup tool supplies the exactness that a larger model does not.