# PhyMetric: Diagnosing Physical Plausibility in Text-to-Video Generation via Scene-Level QA

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19823 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19823/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20314/) (2025)
- [CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06072/) (2024)
- [VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17982/) (2023)
- [OpenAI GPT-5 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03267/) (2025)
- [WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18072/) (2024)
- [Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03575/) (2025)
- [Genie: Generative Interactive Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15391/) (2024)
- [InternVid: A Large-scale Video-Text Dataset for Multimodal Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06942/) (2023)
- [EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11440/) (2023)
- [VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21755/) (2025)
- [VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03520/) (2024)
- [How Far is Video Generation from World Model: A Physical Law Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02385/) (2024)
- [T2V-CompBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14505/) (2024)
- [Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05363/) (2024)
- [PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16411/) (2025)
- [Seedance 2.0: Advancing Video Generation for World Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.14148/) (2026)
- [WorldScore: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for World Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00983/) (2025)
- [VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06800/) (2025)
- [FETV: A Benchmark for Fine-Grained Evaluation of Open-Domain Text-to-Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01813/) (2023)
- [ChronoMagic-Bench: A Benchmark for Metamorphic Evaluation of Text-to-Time-lapse Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18522/) (2024)
- [Video-Bench: Human-Aligned Video Generation Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04907/) (2025)
- [T2VWorldBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating World Knowledge in Text-to-Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18107/) (2025)
- [TRAVL: A Recipe for Making Video-Language Models Better Judges of Physics Implausibility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07550/) (2025)
- [LikePhys: Evaluating Intuitive Physics Understanding in Video Diffusion Models via Likelihood Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11512/) (2025)
- [Physion-Eval: Evaluating Physical Realism in Generated Video via Human Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19607/) (2026)
- [Grounding Creativity in Physics: A Brief Survey of Physical Priors in AIGC](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07007/) (2025)
- [Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08619/) (2024)
- [ETVA: Evaluation of Text-to-Video Alignment via Fine-grained Question Generation and Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16867/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-video (T2V) generation models can produce visually realistic videos that nevertheless violate the physical consequences implied by the prompt and scene. Existing benchmarks largely rely on holistic plausibility scores or broad quality dimensions, leaving it unclear which physical behavior is being tested and why a model fails. We introduce PhyMetric, a scene-level diagnostic benchmark that recasts physical plausibility evaluation as verifiable, scene-grounded question answering. PhyMetric contains 1{,}115 scenes spanning 50 physical categories across six domains, paired with 8{,}920 answer-balanced binary questions over 12 evaluation dimensions. Each scene is associated with eight targeted yes/no questions and a structured physical prior specifying the governing law, expected temporal sequence, observable signatures, and common failure modes. At evaluation time, a vision-language model (VLM) judge answers each question from question-aware sampled frames conditioned on the prior, and correctness is hierarchically aggregated into scene, dimension, physical category, and model scores. Experiments on four open-source T2V models and three VLM judges show that scene-specific binary QA is a critical component of the protocol: when each targeted question is replaced by a single generic plausibility query, evaluator accuracy drops to the chance level. Structured physical priors offer a complementary signal that improves human alignment of the resulting scores, with effects that vary across VLM judges of different capacity. These findings establish PhyMetric as a benchmark that turns physical plausibility evaluation from opaque holistic scoring into interpretable, scene-level inspection. Our project page is available at: https://mengsiwei.github.io/PhyMetric/.