# Who's Behind the Text? Robust Model Authorship Attribution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19583 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19583/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11305/) (2023)
- [A Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10226/) (2023)
- [LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05961/) (2024)
- [Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05130/) (2023)
- [Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12070/) (2024)
- [Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03952/) (2024)
- [DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05540/) (2023)
- [RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07940/) (2024)
- [DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17359/) (2023)
- [HydraLoRA: An Asymmetric LoRA Architecture for Efficient Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19245/) (2024)
- [M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14902/) (2023)
- [TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13296/) (2021)
- [A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14724/) (2023)
- [On the Use of ArXiv as a Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00075/) (2019)
- [MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14822/) (2023)
- [DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20964/) (2024)
- [LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Tool](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15004/) (2023)
- [GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07969/) (2023)
- [GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06202/) (2023)
- [DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23746/) (2024)
- [The Harvard USPTO Patent Dataset: A Large-Scale, Well-Structured, and Multi-Purpose Corpus of Patent Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04043/) (2022)
- [Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12150/) (2025)
- [Token Prediction as Implicit Classification to Identify LLM-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08723/) (2023)
- [ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17382/) (2024)
- [OpenTuringBench: An Open-Model-based Benchmark and Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection and Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11369/) (2025)
- [DetectAnyLLM: Towards Generalizable and Robust Detection of Machine-Generated Text Across Domains and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14268/) (2025)
- [Authorship Attribution in Multilingual Machine-Generated Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01656/) (2025)
- [Generative Classifiers Avoid Shortcut Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.25034/) (2025)
- [Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21223/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate text, their misuse has become a growing societal problem, with implications for academic misconduct, model distillation, and cyberattacks. For these reasons, Model Authorship Attribution (MAA), which identifies the source model of a given text, is important for promoting the responsible use of LLMs and improving AI safety. In practice, attribution systems must remain reliable beyond the distributions observed during training. They may encounter texts from unseen domains and writing settings, as well as generations from future versions of model families that were not available when the system was trained. However, existing MAA methods often exhibit substantial performance degradation under such distribution shifts. To address this challenge, we propose Authorship Tracing via Likelihood-based Attribution of Sources (ATLAS), which formulates MAA through source-conditioned text modeling rather than direct source prediction. ATLAS learns how text from each source family is generated and attributes a given text by comparing its likelihood under each learned source condition. We aggregate this likelihood evidence at the token level with clipping so that no single token dominates the decision. We further introduce MAABench, a broad MAA benchmark for evaluating practical OOD settings such as domain and version. Our experiments show that ATLAS consistently outperforms existing baselines across MAABench and OpenTuringBench. In particular, when both the generation domain and the model version change on MAABench, ATLAS achieves 74.27% accuracy, 9.00pp higher than the strongest baseline. Beyond MAA, ATLAS can also help identify distillation source models by measuring which source model a target LLM most closely resembles. Our extended experiments show that ATLAS recovers the known teacher of every distilled model we evaluate.