# ActICL: Post-Training for Agentic Multimodal In-Context Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19475 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19475/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 62 of its 73 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 62)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15343/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00398/) (2020)
- [Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05176/) (2025)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.07396/) (2016)
- [A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01718/) (2022)
- [From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10830/) (2018)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14804/) (2024)
- [MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02813/) (2024)
- [A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00491/) (2018)
- [DeepEyes: Incentivizing "Thinking with Images" via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14362/) (2025)
- [Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14610/) (2022)
- [Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03096/) (2019)
- [CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18521/) (2024)
- [GeoQA: A Geometric Question Answering Benchmark Towards Multimodal Numerical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14517/) (2021)
- [LLaVA-Plus: Learning to Use Tools for Creating Multimodal Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05437/) (2023)
- [MuirBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robust Multi-image Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09411/) (2024)
- [Self-Adaptive In-Context Learning: An Information Compression Perspective for In-Context Example Selection and Ordering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10375/) (2022)
- [Diverse Demonstrations Improve In-context Compositional Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06800/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal in-context learning (ICL) is an important capability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Its performance is closely tied to the demonstrations it uses, making demonstration retrieval a core problem for ICL. Common methods use fixed scoring methods to retrieve all the demonstrations at once, which may introduce redundancy and noise. Context-aware retrieval methods have emerged to address this problem by allowing incremental retrieval from a growing context. However, none of them lets the MLLM learn how to judge what new demonstrations it needs and then carry out progressive retrieval on its own. To this end, we introduce ActICL, which trains an MLLM agent to acquire and use an ICL context via tool-augmented reasoning. An ActICL agent analyzes its own information gaps during iterative reasoning and tool-use actions. Based on these gaps, it performs targeted retrieval to acquire a set of initial candidates. It can then use the existing context to further filter the candidates and refine the context, or it can iteratively perform a new retrieval. When the agent judges that the context is sufficient for the task, or when the resource limit is reached with the user request met, it sends the acquired context to an answering model, either the agent itself or another MLLM. We use a two-stage post-training procedure that jointly optimizes the agent's acquisition and answering. With an adaptive number of demonstrations, ActICL improves average performance by 11.6 percentage points over standard similarity-based retrieval across seven benchmarks and three MLLMs, and by 4.4 points compared to the strongest prior baseline. The contexts acquired by ActICL agents can also be used effectively by frontier models. When GPT-5.6-Sol performs 4-shot ICL, ActICL's contexts improve its performance by 3.5 points over standard retrieval, averaged over three benchmarks.