# Did the LLM Answer the Question? A Semantic Reconstruction Game for Jailbreak Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19306 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19306/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Jailbreaking](https://mlsanity.com/safety/jailbreaking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04249/) (2024)
- [Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08419/) (2023)
- [Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11717/) (2024)
- [How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06373/) (2024)
- [Improved Techniques for Optimization-Based Jailbreaking on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21018/) (2024)
- [How Real is Your Jailbreak? Fine-grained Jailbreak Evaluation with Anchored Reference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03288/) (2026)
- [SlotGCG: Exploiting the Positional Vulnerability in LLMs for Jailbreak Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05609/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Jailbreak attacks against large language models (LLMs) are evaluated using attack success rate (ASR), which depends on correctly identifying responses that fulfill prohibited requests. Existing evaluators can mistake refusals or topically related responses for successful attacks. We show that changing only the judge LLM can alter reported ASR by up to 82 percentage points. We introduce the semantic reconstruction game, a training-free evaluator that decomposes compliance judgments into constrained semantic comparisons. Given only a response, an LLM reconstructs the request answered by its substantive content, excluding information merely repeated or refused. The game compares this reconstruction against similar decoy requests to determine whether it matches the original request, allowing abstention when neither candidate matches. Across three off-the-shelf LLM judges, the game achieves the lowest mean error against human labels among evaluated methods and reduces variation in reported ASR. It prioritizes avoiding false positives, even at the cost of missing some successful jailbreaks.