# Not All Drift Is a Mechanism: Tracing Prompt Adaptation in LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18412 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18412/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Mixture of LoRA experts, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 42 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [Mixture of LoRA experts](https://mlsanity.com/moe/mixture-of-lora-experts/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17453/) (2023)
- [Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00118/) (2024)
- [Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08600/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01910/) (2022)
- [Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10248/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models as Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03409/) (2023)
- [Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07677/) (2022)
- [Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03495/) (2023)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08112/) (2023)
- [Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04093/) (2024)
- [GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19457/) (2025)
- [Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.04561/) (2019)
- [Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.05147/) (2024)
- [RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12548/) (2022)
- [Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16042/) (2023)
- [In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15916/) (2023)
- [Function Vectors in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15213/) (2023)
- [Massive Activations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17762/) (2024)
- [Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11695/) (2024)
- [Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06102/) (2024)
- [When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10781/) (2024)
- [Auxiliary-Loss-Free Load Balancing Strategy for Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15664/) (2024)
- [OpenMoE: An Early Effort on Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01739/) (2024)
- [Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14800/) (2024)
- [Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same Coin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06477/) (2025)
- [On the Role of Attention in Prompt-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03435/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt-based adaptation offers several ways to specialize a frozen language model, ranging from natural-language prompt optimization to learned continuous prompts. These methods are usually compared through downstream performance, although similar outputs need not arise from similar internal computations. We study how discrete prompt optimization, prompt tuning, and prefix tuning alter the processing of dense and mixture-of-experts language models. Our analysis shows that the location of the adaptation predicts how task information is carried to the output: optimized text primarily changes response construction, input-level prompts write their influence into content representations, and layer-wise prefixes maintain direct control through attention. In MoE models, these differences further induce distinct expert-routing patterns. At the same time, common representation-level measurements respond strongly to generic context changes and do not reliably distinguish useful adaptations from matched placebos. We argue that understanding prompt adaptation requires separating representation drift from the part of that drift that is aligned with, and causally used by, the model's task computation. This perspective provides practical guidance for selecting, evaluating, and interpreting prompt adaptation methods.