# AssetForge: Asset-Augmented Task Synthesis for Business Automation Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18330 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18330/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08491/) (2023)
- [AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18901/) (2024)
- [Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17746/) (2025)
- [Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06585/) (2023)
- [Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08464/) (2024)
- [OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07743/) (2025)
- [The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25726/) (2025)
- [Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06132/) (2026)
- [TaskCraft: Automated Generation of Agentic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10055/) (2025)
- [CRMArena-Pro: Holistic Assessment of LLM Agents Across Diverse Business Scenarios and Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18878/) (2025)
- [Workspace-Bench 1.0: Benchmarking AI Agents on Workspace Tasks with Large-Scale File Dependencies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03596/) (2026)
- [Toward Scalable Terminal Task Synthesis via Skill Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25727/) (2026)
- [DIVE: Scaling Diversity in Agentic Task Synthesis for Generalizable Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11076/) (2026)
- [AutomationBench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.18934/) (2026)
- [RubricEM: Meta-RL with Rubric-guided Policy Decomposition beyond Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10899/) (2026)
- [Mock Worlds, Real Skills: Building Small Agentic Language Models with Synthetic Tasks, Simulated Environments, and Rubric-Based Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22511/) (2026)
- [FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.18580/) (2026)
- [NexForge: Scaling Agent Capabilities through Requirement-Driven Task Synthesis for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14186/) (2026)
- [Optimsyn: Influence-Guided Rubrics Optimization for Synthetic Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00536/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Training business automation agents requires executable tasks that connect a natural-language request to an application state and a verifiable end state. Traditional Rubrics requires Authors to recreate application interfaces, initial records, policy evidence, and outcome checks for each task, entangling business logic with repeated infrastructure work. We introduce AssetForge, an asset-augmented task-construction pipeline that pairs a reusable construction-asset library with task-specific Rubrics. The assets provide application interfaces, world-state components, policy/evidence carriers, and native assertion definitions; the Rubric directs their instantiation for a particular business task. Executable checks and an additional model-based review validate each candidate, return targeted feedback, and support bounded repair before acceptance. On AutomationBench v1.0.6 public-600, fine-tuning Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on 6,000 AssetForge examples yields 41.17% on the official strict pass@1 metric, 4.4 times the 9.33% base score (+31.83 points). With the same backbone and GLM-5.3 supervision, AssetForge reaches 41.17% versus 30.33% for traditional Rubrics, a 10.84-point gain (35.7% relative) at the same accepted-example scale (6,000 versus 6,000 examples). Both DeepSeek- and GLM-supervised AssetForge models improve AppWorld completion over the base model on Test-Normal and Test-Challenge. These results establish the advantage of AssetForge's complete construction pipeline on AutomationBench public: the coupled asset-Rubric interface directs Authors toward business logic, while executable checks and model-based review validate their tasks.