# OneDemo: Unified Policy Learning and Data Generation from a Single Demonstration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18188 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18188/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for robot locomotion and manipulation, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 22 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for robot locomotion and manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-robot-locomotion-and-manipulation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04137/) (2023)
- [Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13705/) (2023)
- [Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10897/) (2019)
- [What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.03298/) (2021)
- [Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.10087/) (2017)
- [RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07864/) (2024)
- [RoboTwin 2.0: A Scalable Data Generator and Benchmark with Strong Domain Randomization for Robust Bimanual Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18088/) (2025)
- [An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.06711/) (2018)
- [The Option-Critic Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.05140/) (2016)
- [Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.10089/) (2017)
- [MimicGen: A Data Generation System for Scalable Robot Learning using Human Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17596/) (2023)
- [Leveraging Demonstrations for Deep Reinforcement Learning on Robotics Problems with Sparse Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08817/) (2017)
- [Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03201/) (2018)
- [DexMimicGen: Automated Data Generation for Bimanual Dexterous Manipulation via Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24185/) (2024)
- [Human-in-the-Loop Imitation Learning using Remote Teleoperation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06733/) (2020)
- [MoDem: Accelerating Visual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.05698/) (2022)
- [NeRF in the Palm of Your Hand: Corrective Augmentation for Robotics via Novel-View Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08556/) (2023)
- [SkillMimicGen: Automated Demonstration Generation for Efficient Skill Learning and Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18907/) (2024)
- [CyberDemo: Augmenting Simulated Human Demonstration for Real-World Dexterous Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14795/) (2024)
- [DemoGrasp: Universal Dexterous Grasping from a Single Demonstration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22149/) (2025)
- [DexFlyWheel: A Scalable and Self-improving Data Generation Framework for Dexterous Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23829/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Learning robot policies from demonstrations is often limited by the cost of collecting diverse, high-quality expert data. While an appealing alternative is to expand a single successful demonstration into a diverse set of successful trajectories, existing augmentation methods typically rely on manually designed transformation rules or complex trajectory planning, requiring substantial task-specific engineering and human effort. We introduce OneDemo, a reinforcement learning framework that learns to edit a single successful demonstration for new task configurations. We formulate demonstration editing as a structured reinforcement learning problem, in which an editor learns, from sparse task-success rewards, both when to transition between object-centric trajectory segments and how to geometrically adapt each segment. The learned editor serves both as a task policy and as a reusable demonstration generator. Across 15 Meta-World tasks, OneDemo reaches a 92.7% success rate within 53.7k environment interactions on average. Across 9 DexMimicGen tasks, it generates successful demonstrations with a 98.4% average success rate, and BC-RNN policies trained on the generated data achieve 99.6% average success at matched dataset scale. These results show that learning to edit a single successful demonstration provides a structured and effective basis for both policy learning and scalable demonstration generation.