# From Policy Evaluation to Off-Policy Control: Provable Emergence of In-Context Q-Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18057 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18057/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Deep RL algorithms and representations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/deep-rl-algorithms-and-representations/)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Transformers can implement reinforcement-learning algorithms in context, yet how off-policy control emerges within Transformers remains poorly understood. We study Q-learning, a foundational model-free control algorithm that combines off-policy bootstrapping with greedy policy improvement. We prove that a two-layer attention-only Transformer can implement a finite-temperature form of Q-learning, where the temperature τ>0 controls the approximation to greedy action selection, recovering window Q-learning as τ→0. We train the structured Transformer on randomly generated MDP tasks using output-only supervision. Experiments show that the theoretically predicted parameter structure emerges during training, including the internal greedy action-selection mechanism, and that the trained Transformer achieves performance comparable to Q-learning on unseen tasks. Our theoretical analysis further shows that the equivalent realizations form a solution manifold and that, under suitable task-diversity conditions, the training iterates converge locally to this manifold at an exponential rate. For the random-task model analyzed here, the local worst-case number of gradient steps needed to reduce the distance to the manifold by a factor ε is Thetaleft(τ-5log(1/varepsilon)right), quantifying the increasing optimization cost as the learned update approaches window Q-learning.
