# Learning Adaptive Deliberation Control for Reliable Recognition with Multi-Agent Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17840 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17840/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08896/) (2023)
- [FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00122/) (2021)
- [Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.01243/) (2021)
- [MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10537/) (2023)
- [LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00976/) (2021)
- [ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13007/) (2023)
- [When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08671/) (2021)
- [AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10468/) (2025)
- [Multi-Step Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11511/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05563/) (2024)
- [Improving Multi-Agent Debate with Sparse Communication Topology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11776/) (2024)
- [Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13160/) (2023)
- [Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Task-Oriented Survey of Recent Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11884/) (2024)
- [Taxonomy of Machine Learning Safety: A Survey and Primer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04823/) (2021)
- [Explainable Goal-Driven Agents and Robots -- A Comprehensive Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09705/) (2020)
- [Enhancing textual textbook question answering with large language models and retrieval augmented generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05128/) (2024)
- [Explaining Predictive Uncertainty by Exposing Second-Order Effects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17441/) (2024)
- [Survey on Leveraging Uncertainty Estimation Towards Trustworthy Deep Neural Networks: The Case of Reject Option and Post-training Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04906/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent deliberation can improve recognition by criticizing and revising candidate answers, but fixed controls cannot respond to changes in disagreement or reasoning quality. We present an adaptive multi-agent controller (ADMA) that learns continuous policies for proposal, challenge, arbitration, and coordination while keeping the task model frozen. Shared trace features describe quality, agreement, and progress, while role-specific features support decentralized control during inference. One controller trained on legal and financial reasoning is transferred without policy updates to four textual and multimodal benchmarks and two successive task-model versions. With Qwen3.5 held fixed, ADMA-Full improves accuracy by 6.2-14.2 percentage points over Direct and by 2.8-3.0 points over ADMA-Fixed. Paired bootstrap ranges for the Full-Fixed comparison are positive on three tasks. Outcome decompositions show that recoveries exceed introduced errors, while process assessment records fewer false-consensus events and more supported correct outcomes. Transfer to Qwen3.6 remains task dependent, which bounds the generality of the learned policy. Median token and latency ratios are 14.3-18.7 and 7.8-16.5 relative to Direct. These results show that adaptive deliberation can improve fixed-model recognition when its task-dependent gains justify the additional computation.