# Reference Wording Shapes Retrieval of Robot Task Instructions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17549 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17549/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06817/) (2022)
- [ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01734/) (2019)
- [CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.12098/) (2021)
- [CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03227/) (2021)
- [Perceiver-Actor: A Multi-Task Transformer for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.05451/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying a robot task from a short instruction is sensitive to which descriptions are available for retrieval. We investigate this effect in the natural-language instructions included with the RLBench manipulation benchmark. We extract 296 fixed descriptions from 62 publicly available task files and compare five training-free lexical rankers over 80 random choices of one indexed description per task. Exact strings assigned to conflicting task labels are excluded from the primary score. Character n-gram TF-IDF achieves 61.3% mean top-1 accuracy on the resulting held-out instructions, compared with 55.6% for BM25 and 54.9% for word TF-IDF. Across gallery choices, character TF-IDF ranges from 55.2% to 66.8%; its 5th-95th percentile range is 56.9%-64.8%. Adding a second indexed description improves character TF-IDF by 7.0 percentage points on matched queries. These results quantify the influence of reference wording and representation choice on instruction-to-task retrieval under a consistent evaluation protocol.