# A Scaled-Up Empirical Study of Syntactic Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16837 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16837/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09864/) (2021)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11641/) (2019)
- [FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08691/) (2023)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00937/) (2018)
- [GLU Variants Improve Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05202/) (2020)
- [Root Mean Square Layer Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07467/) (2019)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17557/) (2024)
- [OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00838/) (2024)
- [BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00582/) (2019)
- [Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02226/) (2023)
- [Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encoder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01052/) (2018)
- [A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03692/) (2020)
- [OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08446/) (2024)
- [Transformer Grammars: Augmenting Transformer Language Models with Syntactic Inductive Biases at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00633/) (2022)
- [Predictable Scale: Part I, Step Law -- Optimal Hyperparameter Scaling Law in Large Language Model Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04715/) (2025)
- [Effective Inference for Generative Neural Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08976/) (2017)
- [Pushdown Layers: Encoding Recursive Structure in Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19089/) (2023)
- [Generative Pretrained Structured Transformers: Unsupervised Syntactic Language Models at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08293/) (2024)
- [Dependency Transformer Grammars: Integrating Dependency Structures into Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.17406/) (2024)
- [GiLT: Augmenting Transformer Language Models with Dependency Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15562/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Syntactic language models (SLMs) that generate sentences along with their syntactic tree structures have shown promise in both syntactic generalization and downstream tasks. Prior studies, however, have mostly evaluated smaller models trained on less pretraining data and tested on narrower task suites. In addition, the design space of tree linearization and attention masks remains underexplored. We conduct a large-scale empirical study of 12 controlled configurations---one terminal baseline and 11 SLM variants spanning different linearizations and masks---at scales up to 1B parameters and 100B training tokens, evaluated across 11 downstream tasks and two syntactic benchmarks. The experimental results show that SLMs with standard causal attention match or exceed structural-mask variants across downstream and syntactic benchmarks. They require no architectural modifications and remain compatible with FlashAttention. We also observe that when scaling up to the 1B-parameter scale, the top-performing SLM variant no longer shows a clear advantage over a compute-matched non-structural baseline, suggesting that SLMs may become less competitive with scale. Our code is available at https://github.com/qlwpc/TG-Interpolation.