# Spectral-Driven Adaptive-Rank Optimizer for Large Language Model Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16533 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16533/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Cost](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.04235/) (2018)
- [Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06675/) (2023)
- [Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09568/) (2018)
- [Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14342/) (2023)
- [Gradient Descent Happens in a Tiny Subspace](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04754/) (2018)
- [GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05242/) (2026)
- [CAME: Confidence-guided Adaptive Memory Efficient Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02047/) (2023)
- [Rethinking Muon Beyond Pretraining: Spectral Failures and High-Pass Remedies for VLA and RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19282/) (2026)
- [Low-rank Optimization Trajectories Modeling for LLM RLVR Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11446/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is reshaping how large language models (LLMs) acquire reasoning capabilities, yet the optimizers used remain largely inherited from teacher-forcing training. This raises a fundamental question: does RLVR induce a distinct optimization geometry that calls for a different optimizer? We investigate this question through the spectral structure of LLM gradients and find that gradient energy progressively concentrates into a shrinking effective subspace, which is characteristic of RLVR, as it is absent under supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and is largely removed when the verifiable reward is replaced by a random one. Moreover, the rank required to capture a fixed fraction of gradient energy steadily decreases over training, revealing that the effective dimensionality of useful updates itself evolves with training. These findings motivate a new optimization principle: rather than prescribing the update rank externally, an optimizer should adapt its rank to the evolving spectral structure of the gradient. We introduce Ares (Adaptive Rank-Effective Spectral Optimization), which estimates the effective update rank from the gradient's spectral energy distribution, tracks its evolution, and confines the gradient signal driving each update to the resulting low-rank subspace. Across LLMs of different scales, Ares improves accuracy over widely used optimizers and generalizes across RLVR algorithms and tasks. Results suggest that effective optimization may require optimizers to be designed around the geometry and dynamics of the training process. We release the code and data at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/Ares.