# Trust-Calibrated VLA Policy Post-Training with Evolving Imagination

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16517 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16517/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning and post-training, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models / [Reinforcement learning and post-training](https://mlsanity.com/vla/reinforcement-learning-and-post-training/)
- Offline RL and imitation learning from data / [Language-conditioned policies and VLAs](https://mlsanity.com/offlinerl/language-conditioned-policies-and-vlas/)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are often pretrained via imitation learning, making reinforcement learning (RL) post-training important when deployment moves beyond demonstration coverage. Existing refinement paradigms expose a reliability--efficiency tension: model-free refinement avoids simulator bias but is interaction-intensive, whereas model-based refinement can exploit unreliable imagination even as its simulator adapts. We propose Model-Evolving Reinforcement Learning (MERL), a trust-calibrated framework that couples policy optimization with an online-updated simulator comprising a world model and a reward proxy head. Across stages, simulator reliability controls the imagined-data ratio and rollout horizon; within rollouts, chunk-level trust controls replay selection and optimization weight. For recursive imagination without exact grounded continuations, a residual predictor estimates trust without querying future ground truth. On perturbed LIBERO-PRO tasks, MERL reaches 79.7% average success, improves high-threshold learning speed by 10.9% over the matched model-free control, and outperforms same-protocol external baselines across three training seeds. Fixed-data adaptation from 50 demonstrations per task achieves 80.0% average success on two physical-robot tasks.