# Of Errors and Echoes: Responsibility-Aware Credit Assignment for Tool-Use Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16027 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16027/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 45 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07982/) (2025)
- [Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13657/) (2025)
- [Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10978/) (2025)
- [The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07301/) (2025)
- [ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11536/) (2025)
- [RAGEN: Understanding Self-Evolution in LLM Agents via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20073/) (2025)
- [ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13958/) (2025)
- [ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04682/) (2024)
- [ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06559/) (2024)
- [ArCHer: Training Language Model Agents via Hierarchical Multi-Turn RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19446/) (2024)
- [RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07857/) (2018)
- [SWEET-RL: Training Multi-Turn LLM Agents on Collaborative Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15478/) (2025)
- [Agent Lightning: Train ANY AI Agents with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03680/) (2025)
- [AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08325/) (2025)
- [ACEBench: Who Wins the Match Point in Tool Usage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12851/) (2025)
- [Agent World Model: Infinity Synthetic Environments for Agentic Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10090/) (2026)
- [Hindsight Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08754/) (2026)
- [EnvScaler: Scaling Tool-Interactive Environments for LLM Agent via Programmatic Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05808/) (2026)
- [Simulating Environments with Reasoning Models for Agent Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01824/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning improves tool-use agents, yet fine-grained credit assignment remains challenging even with step-level feedback. An observed error may be inherited from an earlier decision, while multiple responsible decisions may share the same downstream consequence or participate in later recovery. We introduce Error-Chain-Aware Optimization (ECHO), a responsibility-aware credit assignment framework that separates responsibility identification from credit allocation. A frozen judge combines retrospective trajectory analysis with decision-time assessment from the policy-visible prefix to distinguish newly introduced errors, inherited consequences, missed corrections, and successful corrections. ECHO then counts shared downstream consequences once across responsible decisions and constrains rewards for repairing self-induced errors through source-funded recovery, producing bounded action-level supervision alongside terminal supervision. Experiments on six diverse tool-use benchmarks at both 4B and 8B scales show strong and consistent improvements over the compared baselines, with ECHO achieving the highest score on five of six benchmarks at each scale. These results support decision responsibility as a useful basis for fine-grained credit assignment in tool-use agents. Our code is available at https://github.com/xid32/ECHO.