# Generalizable Model Editing Could Be More Than Direct Generalization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15707 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15707/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14913/) (2020)
- [Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07229/) (2022)
- [Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08696/) (2021)
- [Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08164/) (2021)
- [Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14767/) (2023)
- [Fast Model Editing at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11309/) (2021)
- [Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13172/) (2023)
- [MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14795/) (2023)
- [Evaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.12976/) (2023)
- [Modifying Memories in Transformer Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.00363/) (2020)
- [Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16218/) (2023)
- [PMET: Precise Model Editing in a Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08742/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01286/) (2024)
- [EasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07269/) (2023)
- [Compositional Generalization from First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05596/) (2023)
- [Massive Editing for Large Language Models via Meta Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04661/) (2023)
- [Knowledge Graph Enhanced Large Language Model Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13593/) (2024)
- [Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07819/) (2024)
- [Locate-then-edit for Multi-hop Factual Recall under Knowledge Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06331/) (2024)
- [Perturbation-Restrained Sequential Model Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16821/) (2024)
- [Model Editing by Standard Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11078/) (2024)
- [Compositional Capabilities of Autoregressive Transformers: A Study on Synthetic, Interpretable Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12997/) (2023)
- [Position: Understanding LLMs Requires More Than Statistical Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01964/) (2024)
- [Stable Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13048/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A central desideratum in model editing is generalization to complex tasks, which prior work formalizes under a direct generalization paradigm: treating and evaluating LLM behavior as an input-output mapping and expecting a factual update to alter outputs on reasoning tasks. Yet despite substantial empirical effort, the field consensus remains that such generalization is highly challenging and elusive. However, when we deploy the latest models in an in-the-wild chatbot-user setting, we surprisingly find that even classical editing methods exhibit remarkably fluent generalization behavior. This motivates us to revisit the obstacles to generalization and the limitations of the prevailing paradigm. We find that direct generalization is fundamentally constrained both theoretically and practically: theoretically, it suffers from an identifiability issue; and practically, existing approaches attempting to circumvent this are further hindered by the ambiguity of their constructed biases and by vulnerability to being overridden by other factors such as optimization dynamics. We instead identify compositional generalization, empowered by the increasingly strong reasoning and composition abilities of modern LLMs, as a theoretically grounded and empirically validated alternative. We validate this phenomenon across multiple models and editing methods, showing that such generalization behavior is widespread. Overall, we argue that generalizable model editing could be more than direct generalization, and call for a paradigm shift toward more generalizable and practically deployable knowledge update techniques.