# A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Safety-Aware Haptic Shared Control in Surgical Robotics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15422 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15422/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for robot locomotion and manipulation, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 7 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for robot locomotion and manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-robot-locomotion-and-manipulation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02275/) (2017)
- [The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01955/) (2021)
- [Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06266/) (2021)
- [Co-GAIL: Learning Diverse Strategies for Human-Robot Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06038/) (2021)
- [Real-World Human-Robot Collaborative Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.01156/) (2020)
- [Solving Multi-Agent Safe Optimal Control with Distributed Epigraph Form MARL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15425/) (2025)
- [Toward Adaptive Cooperation: Model-Based Shared Control Using LQ-Differential Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11146/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Haptic shared control in surgical robotics combines human-side and robot-side forces at a shared end effector while preserving operator involvement. However, the effects of geometric safety choices on task execution and force coordination remain unclear. We model the interaction as a two-agent cooperative Markov game under centralized training and decentralized execution, comparing learned human control with a task-tuned fixed-impedance baseline. This model-free multi-agent reinforcement learning framework supports joint policy adaptation without requiring a complete analytical interaction model. It compares MADDPG and rMAPPO with an epigraph-constrained approach under common geometric task definitions. In simulation, rMAPPO generally achieved the highest return and tracking performance, whereas the epigraph approach produced more conservative motions and lower geometric exposure, including no observed collision or dangerous-region exposure after geometry transfer. With real operator input, fixed-impedance-trained policies were faster and successful in all recorded trials. Policies trained with a learned partner exhibited greater command opposition, while the fixed epigraph condition produced the most aligned commands. This work provides a benchmark for studying human-control representation and constraint-handling trade-offs in haptic shared control.