# Mixing Regularization for Average-Reward Q-Learning and Q-Planning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14988 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14988/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL theory and sample complexity](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-theory-and-sample-complexity/)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The average-reward setting for reinforcement learning is challenging because its Bellman operator is known to contract in span only when the underlying Markov chain is mixing. Whereas existing work typically assumes a contraction property, e.g., through environment mixing, we consider the setting where we are given a reward-agnostic m-step mixing policy, and we control the contraction and exploration properties of the learned policy by regularizing toward the mixing policy. We provide finite-time analysis of Q-learning algorithms that can be instantiated with multiple choices of regularization, with guarantees measured with respect to the regularized fixed point. Our framework exposes novel regularizer-dependent objects that control contraction, exploration, and operator bias. In the one-step setting, our rates match the best known rates for Q-iteration and synchronous Q-learning, and for m-step mixing we derive new rates. We also study Q-planning variants, and show that planning acts as time-localized learning, where the planning horizon H trades off the bias from the boundary value against the sample complexity. Finally, we present numerical studies validating the analysis: (i) knowledge of a strong mixing policy improves convergence and exploration, and its advantage increases with bottleneck severity and, (ii) our theory predicts the convergence and bias rankings of regularizers from the α-divergence family.