# Exact Phase-Type Point Processes for Certified Measurement and Prediction of Event Streams

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14948 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14948/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.1078/) (2014)
- [Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.04933/) (2022)
- [Transformer Hawkes Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09291/) (2020)
- [Neural Jump Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10403/) (2019)
- [Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12127/) (2019)
- [Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.09690/) (2019)
- [Neural Temporal Point Processes: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.03528/) (2021)
- [Neural Spatio-Temporal Point Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.04583/) (2020)
- [Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.00044/) (2021)
- [Learning Granger Causality for Hawkes Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04511/) (2016)
- [EasyTPP: Towards Open Benchmarking Temporal Point Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08097/) (2023)
- [Uncovering Causality from Multivariate Hawkes Integrated Cumulants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06333/) (2016)
- [Decomposable Transformer Point Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18158/) (2024)
- [On the Predictive Accuracy of Neural Temporal Point Process Models for Continuous-time Event Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17066/) (2023)
- [HoTPP Benchmark: Are We Good at the Long Horizon Events Forecasting?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14341/) (2024)
- [Deep Continuous-Time State-Space Models for Marked Event Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19634/) (2024)
- [Mamba Hawkes Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05302/) (2024)
- [Advances in Temporal Point Processes: Bayesian, Neural, and LLM Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14291/) (2025)
- [Hawkes graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.01879/) (2016)
- [Hyper Hawkes Processes: Interpretable Models of Marked Temporal Point Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01096/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal point processes are used both to measure market mechanisms, for example how fast prices absorb news and how much of the reaction is the market responding to itself, and to predict the next event. We show that one algebraic object, the phase-type (Erlang-chain) state space, serves both purposes with exact likelihoods. For measurement, we build a multiscale phase-type Hawkes process whose parameters all enter linearly. Its log-likelihood is concave, and we compute the global maximum together with a Fenchel duality-gap certificate. A Markov embedding gives the response to an exogenous shock, echoes included, in closed form, and this response is stable if and only if the spectral radius of the branching matrix is below one. Applied to six markets around 670 scheduled macroeconomic releases (2022-2026) with a built-in placebo test, the model shows that the direct reaction to CPI, payrolls, PPI and the FOMC statement is absorbed in about a second, while the market's own echoes stretch half of the response to 16-137 s. For prediction, we introduce EPT-X, a neural point process that adds a history-dependent mixture-of-Erlang renewal channel to a linear Hawkes backbone. Its intensity and compensator remain in closed form, its states follow an affine recursion that trains with a parallel scan, and it can start from the certified fit of the measurement model. EPT-X has the best test likelihood on all five LOBSTER order-book streams and on Retweet and Taobao, and is level with the best published model on StackOverflow. We also find that the EasyTPP implementation of IntensityFree clamps short inter-event times before scoring, and that the gaps of the EasyTPP Amazon data are uniform on two fixed intervals.