# YOUDrive: Driving Style as a Composable Direction for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14802 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14802/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning VLA and VLM driving policies, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Reasoning VLA and VLM driving policies](https://mlsanity.com/driving/reasoning-vla-and-vlm-driving-policies/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05482/) (2022)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [Editing Models with Task Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04089/) (2022)
- [Planning-oriented Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10156/) (2022)
- [TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01708/) (2023)
- [VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12077/) (2023)
- [TransFuser: Imitation with Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15997/) (2022)
- [Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21509/) (2025)
- [DiffusionDrive: Truncated Diffusion Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15139/) (2024)
- [Hydra-MDP: End-to-end Multimodal Planning with Multi-target Hydra-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06978/) (2024)
- [Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07962/) (2023)
- [EMMA: End-to-End Multimodal Model for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23262/) (2024)
- [End-to-End Driving with Online Trajectory Evaluation via BEV World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01941/) (2025)
- [GoalFlow: Goal-Driven Flow Matching for Multimodal Trajectories Generation in End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05689/) (2025)
- [Generalized Trajectory Scoring for End-to-end Multimodal Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06664/) (2025)
- [StyleDrive: Towards Driving-Style Aware Benchmarking of End-To-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23982/) (2025)
- [Learning Personalized Driving Styles via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10434/) (2025)
- [StyleVLA: Driving Style-Aware Vision Language Action Model for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09482/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

End-to-end driving policies can achieve strong task performance while offering limited control over their driving style. Driving style describes how a vehicle accelerates, brakes, and maintains distance. Policies trained without explicit preference conditioning lack a direct mechanism for adjusting these behaviors at inference. We propose YOUDrive, a vision--language--action planner for continuous and composable driving-style control. Each teacher's behavior is distilled into a task vector, a learned parameter update that induces a style direction in the planner's representation. These directions can be scaled and combined at inference without retraining the backbone. Conditioned on these directions, a flow-matching decoder models a multimodal trajectory distribution and generates kinematically feasible motion alternatives. We introduce the Style Alignment Score (SAS) to describe human-referenced kinematic behavior after safety and task gating. On NAVSIM navtest, a single coefficient monotonically controls assertiveness across six teacher-derived personas, while PDMS remains above 0.90 across the tested individual and blended configurations, reaching 0.954. Further analyses reveal systematic policy-specific kinematics after controlling for scene context, whereas the evaluated discrete style labels provide limited additional explanatory power. Code, checkpoints, and the metric will be released.