# CrossMean: Model Merging by Pairing Merged and Expert Activations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14762 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14762/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 60 of its 80 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 60)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08402/) (2022)
- [Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08415/) (2016)
- [Describing Textures in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.3618/) (2013)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraft](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.5151/) (2013)
- [EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00029/) (2017)
- [Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07143/) (2022)
- [Editing Models with Task Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04089/) (2022)
- [TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01708/) (2023)
- [Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00121/) (2017)
- [Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01903/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03099/) (2023)
- [Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.05671/) (2019)
- [Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09832/) (2021)
- [Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04836/) (2022)
- [Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01718/) (2018)
- [Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09849/) (2022)
- [Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05759/) (2018)
- [Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.07666/) (2024)
- [AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02575/) (2023)
- [Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12827/) (2023)
- [Model Fusion via Optimal Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.05653/) (2019)
- [Evolutionary Optimization of Model Merging Recipes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13187/) (2024)
- [LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12462/) (2020)
- [ZipIt! Merging Models from Different Tasks without Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03053/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Model merging combines fine-tuned experts into one network without retraining, and closed-form methods compute each merged layer from statistics of its input activations. However, these statistics are measured on a single expert, while in the merged model, each layer receives activations from the merged layers that precede it. Recent work re-measures these statistics in the merged model but still forms them from a single network. We formulate closed-form methods as a linear system and show that they use the same matrix on both sides. We then introduce CrossMean, which replaces this matrix on one side with a bilinear statistic that pairs merged and expert activations. From the same statistics, we also derive a label-free criterion that indicates the task sets in which accounting for the merged activations improves the merge more. Empirically, task sets with a lower criterion value show a larger improvement. On the eight-task benchmark of each vision backbone that we tested and on BERT encoders, CrossMean improves on merging with statistics measured on the experts, and with all linear layers merged, it also improves on re-measuring these statistics in the merged model. These results suggest that merging benefits from pairing merged and expert activations.