# Are Multimodal Benchmarks Really Useful? Item-Level Multimodal Benchmark Diagnosis via Structure-Response Co-Calibration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14542 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14542/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00685/) (2023)
- [What matters when building vision-language models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02246/) (2024)
- [Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05444/) (2025)
- [Quantifying & Modeling Multimodal Interactions: An Information Decomposition Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12247/) (2023)
- [Gaussian Partial Information Decomposition: Bias Correction and Application to High-dimensional Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10515/) (2023)
- [Efficient Quantification of Multimodal Interaction at Sample Level](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17248/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Cross-Modal Reasoning Ability and Problem Characteristics with Multimodal Item Response Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02663/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal benchmarks are central to evaluating whether models can reason over information from multiple modalities. However, existing literature has revealed that some benchmarks may contain shortcut items that can be answered from a single modality or from answer-option regularities alone, thus failing to reflect models' true cross-modal inference ability. Existing methods for assessing benchmarks typically rely either on intrinsic item structure or extrinsic model response behavior, which are not adequate for a comprehensive diagnosis. To fill in this gap, we propose SRCoD, a structure-response co-calibrated diagnosis framework for item-level diagnosis of modality dependence in multimodal benchmarks. SRCoD estimates sample-wise multimodal information structure from benchmark content and target answers, and uses this signal as a soft structural anchor for modality-conditioned item response modeling. The learned model produces a calibrated item-level diagnostic profile that reflects how strongly an item depends on different forms of modality evidence, enabling fine-grained benchmark analysis beyond aggregate accuracy. SRCoD also provides interpretable attribution of the diagnosis results. Extensive experiments under two complementary protocols, i.e., benchmark-refinement oriented validation and human-labeled item validation, demonstrate that SRCoD outperforms state-of-the-art benchmark diagnosis methods.