# Continuous-Time Cloth Dynamics with Physics-Informed Neural ODEs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14342 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14342/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10047/) (2020)
- [DiffTaichi: Differentiable Programming for Physical Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00935/) (2019)
- [PINNacle: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08827/) (2023)
- [PhysTwin: Physics-Informed Reconstruction and Simulation of Deformable Objects from Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17973/) (2025)
- [Physics informed deep learning for computational elastodynamics without labeled data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08472/) (2020)
- [Scalable Differentiable Physics for Learning and Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02168/) (2020)
- [Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15969/) (2023)
- [DiffCloth: Differentiable Cloth Simulation with Dry Frictional Contact](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05306/) (2021)
- [PINNsFormer: A Transformer-Based Framework For Physics-Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11833/) (2023)
- [Learning in Sinusoidal Spaces with Physics-Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09338/) (2021)
- [Transfer learning based physics-informed neural networks for solving inverse problems in engineering structures under different loading scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07731/) (2022)
- [Quadratic Residual Networks: A New Class of Neural Networks for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems in Physics Involving PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08366/) (2021)
- [Dynamic 3D Gaussian Tracking for Graph-Based Neural Dynamics Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18912/) (2024)
- [DiffCloud: Real-to-Sim from Point Clouds with Differentiable Simulation and Rendering of Deformable Objects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03139/) (2022)
- [Particle-Grid Neural Dynamics for Learning Deformable Object Models from RGB-D Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15680/) (2025)
- [Diffusion Dynamics Models with Generative State Estimation for Cloth Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11999/) (2025)
- [Unfolding the Literature: A Review of Robotic Cloth Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01361/) (2024)
- [Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Shell Structures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14291/) (2022)
- [Differentiable Discrete Elastic Rods for Real-Time Modeling of Deformable Linear Objects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05931/) (2024)
- [NeuralClothSim: Neural Deformation Fields Meet the Thin Shell Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12970/) (2023)
- [Can Real-to-Sim Approaches Capture Dynamic Fabric Behavior for Robotic Fabric Manipulation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16310/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present ContinuousCloth, a continuous-time, physics-informed neural solver for deformable cloth dynamics that enforces a spring--mass ODE within a neural trajectory model. Unlike classical time-stepping simulators that return trajectories only on a discrete integration grid, ContinuousCloth supports querying at arbitrary timestamps and computing displacement, velocity, and acceleration via automatic differentiation. We evaluate ContinuousCloth along two dimensions. In a physics-only setting, ContinuousCloth achieves trajectory accuracy comparable to high-precision solvers across six diverse boundary-condition scenarios while reducing runtime by up to 17.4 times. When fused with sparse and noisy observations, the spring--mass ODE acts as a strong inductive bias for downstream tasks: interpolation and parameter estimation. That is, ContinuousCloth reduces interpolation error by 7.3 times over a data-only neural baseline in simulation and 2.4 times on real-world cloth sequences, and achieves 2.6 times lower parameter error than a differentiable-solver baseline under high-noise conditions, demonstrating consistent robustness under realistic measurement imperfections.
