# How Vision Transformers Represent Position: A Mechanistic Comparison of Absolute and Rotary Positional Encodings

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13992 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13992/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09864/) (2021)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08600/) (2023)
- [DINOv3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10104/) (2025)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [Vision Transformers Need Registers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16588/) (2023)
- [How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10270/) (2021)
- [Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04093/) (2024)
- [DeiT III: Revenge of the ViT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07118/) (2022)
- [EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11331/) (2023)
- [The Impact of Positional Encoding on Length Generalization in Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19466/) (2023)
- [When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data Augmentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01548/) (2021)
- [Rotary Position Embedding for Vision Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13298/) (2024)
- [Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29358/) (2026)
- [Transformer Language Models without Positional Encodings Still Learn Positional Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16634/) (2022)
- [Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06205/) (2024)
- [Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12892/) (2025)
- [Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05276/) (2024)
- [Dissecting Transformer Length Extrapolation via the Lens of Receptive Field Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10356/) (2022)
- [Beyond Semantics: Rediscovering Spatial Awareness in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17349/) (2025)
- [LookHere: Vision Transformers with Directed Attention Generalize and Extrapolate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13985/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Positional embeddings encode the spatial position of each image patch in a Vision Transformer (ViT), allowing the model to distinguish different spatial arrangements of visual content. However, we know little about how the choice of embedding shapes a vision transformer's internal representation. In this work, we show that Absolute Positional Embeddings (APE) and Rotary Positional Embeddings (RoPE) encode spatial position through different internal mechanisms: APE stores position in explicit features, while RoPE builds it inside attention and rebuilds it when it is withheld. Specifically, in APE models, sparse autoencoders recover causal row- and column-specific features, whereas interventions on RoPE reveal distinct rotary components that separately encode row and column information. Additionally, causal interventions selectively disabling RoPE's row or column rotations show that decodable row and column information can be independently removed and, once rotations are restored, partly reconstructed, in part by axis-specialized attention heads. Both mechanisms are causally important for classification: permuting APE's positional features across patches reduces top-1 accuracy by 24--31 points, and ablating the rotations of RoPE's primary rebuilding head reduces it more than ablating those of any other head. Our findings show that the choice of positional encoding fundamentally changes how spatial information is organized and processed inside Vision Transformers. More broadly, our work demonstrates how mechanistic analysis can reveal how models construct, reconstruct, and maintain structured representations, providing a basis for targeted interventions in vision models.