# A Baseline Assessment for the Agentic Web Technology Stack

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13703 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13703/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 25 of its 63 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01206/) (2022)
- [Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06070/) (2023)
- [ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03768/) (2020)
- [Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19413/) (2025)
- [Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14470/) (2024)
- [ST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06703/) (2024)
- [Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01534/) (2025)
- [SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04957/) (2025)
- [A survey of agent interoperability protocols: Model Context Protocol (MCP), Agent Communication Protocol (ACP), Agent-to-Agent Protocol (A2A), and Agent Network Protocol (ANP)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02279/) (2025)
- [PentestGPT: An LLM-empowered Automatic Penetration Testing Tool](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06782/) (2023)
- [AgentSims: An Open-Source Sandbox for Large Language Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04026/) (2023)
- [A Survey of AI Agent Protocols](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16736/) (2025)
- [Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14938/) (2023)
- [Clembench: Using Game Play to Evaluate Chat-Optimized Language Models as Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13455/) (2023)
- [Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21206/) (2025)
- [Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10750/) (2023)
- [Gentopia: A Collaborative Platform for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04030/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking LLM powered Chatbots: Methods and Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04624/) (2023)
- [Assessing and Verifying Task Utility in LLM-Powered Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02178/) (2024)
- [Sampling Algorithms, from Survey Sampling to Monte Carlo Methods: Tutorial and Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00901/) (2020)
- [Verifiable Social Reasoning for LLM Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.17496/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The fast pace in which protocols, frameworks, and technologies are being proposed for LLM-based agents results in a complex scenario for anyone aiming to create state-of-the-art AI solutions. Without an assessment on how different protocols, frameworks, and libraries work together to compose an Agentic Web solution, developers and organizations face different challenges (e.g., skilling, governance, infrastructure) even before becoming part of the Agentic Web ecosystem. In this context, we propose a system for performing Agentic Web evaluations called MASTIF (Multi-Agent System TestIng Framework) and present a baseline assessment of Agentic Web technologies, including 3 LLMs, 3 protocols, and 4 agent implementation frameworks, against 300 Mind2Web benchmark tasks. Results suggest that selecting a task-specific technology stack may result in gains of task completion rate, efficiency score, and social value stability scores; and reductions in verbosity and time to complete tasks. With the presented results, we expect to present a baseline in terms of metrics and results for this complex and fast evolving scenario for those aiming at designing, assessing, and developing multi-agent systems.