# BoundaryEvo: Data-Model Co-Evolution at the Capability Boundary for Long-Chain Reasoning Distillation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13285 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13285/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)
- Knowledge distillation / [Knowledge distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/knowledge-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)
- [Prioritized Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.05952/) (2015)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.07947/) (2016)
- [MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12284/) (2023)
- [Self-Rewarding Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10020/) (2024)
- [WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09583/) (2023)
- [Textbooks Are All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11644/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Deep Active Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.00236/) (2020)
- [Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08998/) (2023)
- [LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03387/) (2025)
- [What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15685/) (2023)
- [Token-Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18547/) (2024)
- [R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05004/) (2025)
- [ZebraLogic: On the Scaling Limits of LLMs for Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01100/) (2025)
- [AIMO-2 Winning Solution: Building State-of-the-Art Mathematical Reasoning Models with OpenMathReasoning dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16891/) (2025)
- [QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09739/) (2024)
- [D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12284/) (2023)
- [Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00674/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Distilling long-chain reasoning trajectories from large teacher models provides an effective way to improve the reasoning ability of small language models. However, existing methods typically select a fixed training set before distillation, overlooking that the usefulness of a reasoning example changes as the student evolves. This mismatch becomes especially costly when only a small number of teacher trajectories can be used for training. Besides, examples already mastered provide little new supervision, while examples far beyond the capability of student may be difficult to learn from. Training data should therefore adapt as model capability evolves, yet reliable data selection is difficult when the student is initially weak. To address these challenges, our key idea is to first establish the basic reasoning capability and then adapt the training data to the evolving capability boundary of the student. We propose BoundaryEvo, a two-stage data--model co-evolution framework. In Capability Priming, we directly distill a small set of teacher-generated long reasoning trajectories without using a separate model to judge and filter them, allowing the student to acquire an initial reasoning capability before capability-aware data selection. In Capability-Boundary Co-Evolution, we repeatedly select questions that the current student has not mastered but the expert can reliably solve, and update the training data as the student evolves. With only 1,000 training examples, BoundaryEvo consistently outperforms static and dynamic data selection baselines across 11 reasoning benchmarks, raising the original Qwen3.5-4B accuracy from 62.9 to 75.3 on IMO-AnswerBench and from 26.8 to 46.0 on AMO-Bench. The code and data will be made publicly available.