# MetaOPD: Meta-Learned Token Weighting for On-Policy Distillation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11989 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11989/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05101/) (2017)
- [Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04475/) (2024)
- [Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13016/) (2026)
- [Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12125/) (2026)
- [Entropy-Aware On-Policy Distillation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07079/) (2026)
- [DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03898/) (2024)
- [TIP: Token Importance in On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.14084/) (2026)
- [Scaling Reasoning Efficiently via Relaxed On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11137/) (2026)
- [Not All Disagreement Is Learnable: Token Teachability in On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26844/) (2026)
- [Filter, Then Reweight: Rethinking Optimization Granularity in On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02684/) (2026)
- [When Are Teacher Tokens Reliable? Position-Weighted On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21606/) (2026)
- [On the Position Bias of On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22600/) (2026)
- [Pass the Baton: Trajectory-Relayed On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26057/) (2026)
- [Mismatch Matters: On-Policy Distillation Beyond Token Agreement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09836/) (2026)
- [SPOT: Sparse Probing and Outcome Calibration for On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04419/) (2026)
- [LLM Data Selection and Utilization via Dynamic Bi-level Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16178/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own generated responses using token-level teacher supervision. However, uniform weighting overlooks differences in token learning value, while existing weighting methods rely on predefined mappings from prediction signals to token weights. These mappings are not learned from the effectiveness of the resulting student updates, limiting their ability to adapt to evolving learning needs. In this paper, we propose MetaOPD, a bilevel optimization framework that jointly learns the student model and a lightweight token-weighting network. The inner objective updates the student through weighted OPD, while the outer objective optimizes the weighting network using validation loss on reference solutions after a virtual student update. Differentiating through this update connects weighting decisions to their effects on post-update performance, allowing the mapping from prediction signals to token weights to evolve alongside the student. Experiments on six mathematical reasoning and three out-of-domain datasets, covering two student scales and seven baselines, demonstrate the effectiveness of MetaOPD, with Avg@8/Pass@8 gains over OPD of 1.99/5.97 percentage points for the 0.6B student and 2.25/6.41 points for the 1.7B student.