# When History Helps and Hurts: Selective History Use across Multimodal Turns

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11948 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11948/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02713/) (2024)
- [Qwen3-Omni Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17765/) (2025)
- [MiniCPM-o 4.5: Towards Real-Time Full-Duplex Omni-Modal Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.27393/) (2026)
- [MiMo-Audio: Audio Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.23808/) (2025)
- [Seed2.0 Model Card: Towards Intelligence Frontier for Real-World Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.00248/) (2026)
- [Nemotron 3 Nano Omni: Efficient and Open Multimodal Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.24954/) (2026)
- [InteractiveOmni: A Unified Omni-modal Model for Audio-Visual Multi-turn Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13747/) (2025)
- [StepAudio 3 Realtime Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14005/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable multimodal interaction depends on selective use of conversational history: an earlier question may remain relevant while its previous answer is outdated, whereas a current request may depend on historical evidence despite conflicting new observations. Existing multi-turn evaluations rarely separate these history-use demands from underlying question difficulty. To address this gap, we introduce ReTurn, a benchmark of 7,000 base tasks spanning visual and audio evidence for evaluating selective history use. For task-carrying history, Reconfirm/Reground require applying a historical question to current media while varying historical agreement; for evidence-carrying history, Retrieve/Rebind require answering a current question using historical media while varying current-media competition. Each pair preserves the target question, media, and answer. Tasks support open-ended and multiple-choice evaluation, with matched single-turn counterparts serving as answerability references. Across 13 omni-modal, vision-language, and audio-language models, median model-level open-ended accuracy falls from 93.7% with direct input to 72.3% in conversation. Behavioral probes show that high question recall can coexist with weaker task application, while competing media can redirect answers away from historical targets. Supervised adaptation yields only partial gains. ReTurn provides a controlled framework for assessing whether multimodal models select and use the historical information required by each request.