# Skill-V: Verifiable Self-Evolving Skill Library for Interactive Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11781 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11781/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03768/) (2020)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02556/) (2025)
- [Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20534/) (2025)
- [SkillRL: Evolving Agents via Recursive Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08234/) (2026)
- [SimpleMem: Efficient Lifelong Memory for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02553/) (2026)
- [SkillOpt: Executive Strategy for Self-Evolving Agent Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23904/) (2026)
- [EvolveR: Self-Evolving LLM Agents through an Experience-Driven Lifecycle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16079/) (2025)
- [MemRL: Self-Evolving Agents via Runtime Reinforcement Learning on Episodic Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03192/) (2026)
- [SkillRouter: Skill Routing for LLM Agents at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22455/) (2026)
- [SkillOS: Learning Skill Curation for Self-Evolving Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06614/) (2026)
- [Skill1: Unified Evolution of Skill-Augmented Agents via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06130/) (2026)
- [SkillRevise: Improving LLM-Authored Agent Skills via Trace-Conditioned Skill Revision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01139/) (2026)
- [SkillOps: Managing LLM Agent Skill Libraries as Self-Maintaining Software Ecosystems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13716/) (2026)
- [RetroAgent: From Solving to Evolving via Retrospective Dual Intrinsic Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08561/) (2026)
- [Skill-R1: Agent Skill Evolution via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09359/) (2026)
- [Task Decomposition-Guided Reranking for Adaptive Agent Skill Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.06283/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Interactive agents can turn experience into reusable skills, yet existing self-evolving skill libraries primarily improve by accumulating new knowledge. Failures may lead to new skills, while previously stored skills are less often revisited as new evidence arrives. However, growth alone does not ensure reliability, as a retrieved skill may be inapplicable under the current task conditions, and an existing skill may encode a mis-specified operational boundary. Reliable skill evolution therefore requires not only adding knowledge, but also testing and revising what is already stored. We introduce Skill-V, a verifiable self-evolving skill library. To make stored knowledge testable, we propose representing skills as versioned, falsifiable contracts that link semantic intent to observable behavioral criteria. We use environment outcomes to drive library evolution. Specifically, task failures motivate skill addition, while disagreements between contract evaluations and task outcomes guide revisions to existing skill boundaries. To validate these revisions, we require them to preserve protected semantic constraints and satisfy non-regression criteria for rubric-outcome metrics on historical replay evidence. Finally, we employ an applicability-aware filter to exclude candidates judged confidently inapplicable to the current task. Across ALFWorld and WebShop, Skill-V achieves success rates of 95.3% and 85.9%, respectively, while maintaining a more compact skill library than growth-oriented baselines. Applicability-aware filtering reduces incorrect skill invocations, and outcome-grounded revisions correct mis-specified skill boundaries without degrading performance on previously observed evidence. These results show that reliable skill evolution requires more than accumulating experience: the library must learn which knowledge to retain, when to revise it, and when it should be applied.