# Balancing Reference Guidance and Free Generation in Trajectory Rollouts for Reasoning RL

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11128 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11128/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 34 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12599/) (2025)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18734/) (2026)
- [Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06585/) (2023)
- [Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20802/) (2026)
- [Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00674/) (2026)
- [Critique-GRPO: Advancing LLM Reasoning with Natural Language and Numerical Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03106/) (2025)
- [Training Large Language Models for Reasoning through Reverse Curriculum Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05808/) (2024)
- [Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01679/) (2025)
- [POPE: Learning to Reason on Hard Problems via Privileged On-Policy Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18779/) (2026)
- [Towards a Unified View of Large Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04419/) (2025)
- [Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02710/) (2026)
- [GHPO: Adaptive Guidance for Stable and Efficient LLM Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10628/) (2025)
- [NGRPO: Negative-enhanced Group Relative Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18851/) (2025)
- [Self-Hinting Language Models Enhance Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03143/) (2026)
- [Stepwise Guided Policy Optimization: Coloring your Incorrect Reasoning in GRPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11595/) (2025)
- [SuperRL: Reinforcement Learning with Supervision to Boost Language Model Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01096/) (2025)
- [Adaptive Guidance Accelerates Reinforcement Learning of Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13923/) (2025)
- [What is the objective of reasoning with reinforcement learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13651/) (2025)
- [Staying in the Sweet Spot: Responsive Reasoning Evolution via Capability-Adaptive Hint Scaffolding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06923/) (2025)
- [Reuse your FLOPs: Scaling RL on Hard Problems by Conditioning on Very Off-Policy Prefixes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18795/) (2026)
- [Learning to Hint for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00698/) (2026)
- [Learning Robust Reasoning through Guided Adversarial Self-Play](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00173/) (2026)
- [Gradient Starvation in Binary-Reward GRPO: Why Group-Mean Centering Fails and Why the Simplest Fix Works](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07689/) (2026)
- [Recycling Failures: Salvaging Exploration in RLVR via Fine-Grained Off-Policy Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.24110/) (2026)
- [Max Out GRPO Signal: Adaptive Trace Prefix Control for Hard Reasoning Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07674/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A verified reference solution provides a correct trajectory for training a reasoning model. Alternatively, a prefix of the reference can guide the model in generating a trajectory of its own. How much reference guidance should we provide? We study this question through prefix continuation, where the model continues from a reference prefix and keeps the resulting trajectory if it passes verification, falling back to the reference otherwise. Since both procedures produce correct trajectories, we compare their distributions with the ideal distribution, the model's own distribution conditioned on successful verification. For one continuation, we derive the KL divergence in closed form, which, up to a bounded term, decreases with the product of the probability of generating a different correct trajectory and the reference surprisal, the negative log probability of the reference suffix given the prefix. Since a longer prefix tends to raise the former but lowers the latter, continuation success alone does not determine the preferred amount of guidance. From this analysis, we learn a prefix selector shared across training questions from continuation outcomes, without estimating success probabilities or additional generation. The resulting Adaptive Reference Guidance (ARG) constructs correct trajectories within a fixed generation budget, and we apply it to all-failure groups in Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Experiments on Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that ARG achieves the highest aggregate pass@12 among the evaluated methods with competitive average sampled accuracy.
