# Explicit Geometric Chain-of-Thought for Vision-Language-Action in Autonomous Driving

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10390 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.10390/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Chain-of-thought reasoning for driving, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 31 of its 75 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Chain-of-thought reasoning for driving](https://mlsanity.com/lr/chain-of-thought-reasoning-for-driving/)
- Vision-language-action models / [VLA for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/vla/vla-for-autonomous-driving/)
- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Reasoning VLA and VLM driving policies](https://mlsanity.com/driving/reasoning-vla-and-vlm-driving-policies/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [Depth Anything 3: Recovering the Visual Space from Any Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10647/) (2025)
- [SpatialVLA: Exploring Spatial Representations for Visual-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15830/) (2025)
- [VADv2: End-to-End Vectorized Autonomous Driving via Probabilistic Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13243/) (2024)
- [AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13757/) (2025)
- [Hydra-MDP: End-to-end Multimodal Planning with Multi-target Hydra-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06978/) (2024)
- [ReCogDrive: A Reinforced Cognitive Framework for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08052/) (2025)
- [BEVerse: Unified Perception and Prediction in Birds-Eye-View for Vision-Centric Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09743/) (2022)
- [OpenDriveVLA: Towards End-to-end Autonomous Driving with Large Vision Language Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23463/) (2025)
- [Senna: Bridging Large Vision-Language Models and End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22313/) (2024)
- [LLM4Drive: A Survey of Large Language Models for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01043/) (2023)
- [Spatial Forcing: Implicit Spatial Representation Alignment for Vision-language-action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12276/) (2025)
- [Learning from Videos for 3D World: Enhancing MLLMs with 3D Vision Geometry Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24625/) (2025)
- [DriveMoE: Mixture-of-Experts for Vision-Language-Action Model in End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16278/) (2025)
- [GeoVLA: Empowering 3D Representations in Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09071/) (2025)
- [AdaThinkDrive: Adaptive Thinking via Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13769/) (2025)
- [DepthVLA: Enhancing Vision-Language-Action Models with Depth-Aware Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13375/) (2025)
- [G2VLM: Geometry Grounded Vision Language Model with Unified 3D Reconstruction and Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21688/) (2025)
- [SGDrive: Scene-to-Goal Hierarchical World Cognition for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05640/) (2026)
- [Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving: Past, Present, and Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.16760/) (2025)
- [SpaceDrive: Infusing Spatial Awareness into VLM-based Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10719/) (2025)
- [LaST-VLA: Thinking in Latent Spatio-Temporal Space for Vision-Language-Action in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01928/) (2026)
- [Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15722/) (2025)
- [VGGDrive: Empowering Vision-Language Models with Cross-View Geometric Grounding for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20794/) (2026)
- [UniDriveVLA: Unifying Understanding, Perception, and Action Planning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02190/) (2026)
- [Thinking with Geometry: Active Geometry Integration for Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06037/) (2026)
- [DrivePI: Spatial-aware 4D MLLM for Unified Autonomous Driving Understanding, Perception, Prediction and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.12799/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Thought for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Survey and Future Prospects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20223/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language-action~(VLA) models have emerged as a promising paradigm for autonomous driving. However, existing VLA models still suffer from a fundamental mismatch: driving actions require precise 3D geometric cues, while visual-language understanding and reasoning are largely conducted in a 2D semantic space. In this paper, we propose GeoCoTDrive, an explicit geometric chain-of-thought framework that grounds geometry in a planning-oriented manner. GeoCoTDrive follows a think with 2D first, drive with dedicated 3D priors paradigm. It first grounds 2D regions corresponding to decision-critical cues, and then retrieves localized 3D priors by sampling features from a geometric foundation model within the grounded regions. These localized geometric features are interleaved into the autoregressive context to support the trajectory generation. To supervise this process, we introduce planning-relevant grounding, a new region-level grounding task that focuses on local spatial cues directly affecting ego planning decisions, and construct the PlanningGrounding dataset to endow VLAs with planning-oriented grounding capability. Experiments across multiple end-to-end autonomous driving benchmarks show that GeoCoTDrive consistently improves safety-critical planning performance, demonstrating the effectiveness of the explicit geometric chain-of-thought process for VLA-based planning.
