# Visual Evidence Under Cross-Examination: Evaluating and Controlling Decision-Level Evidence Use in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09550 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.09550/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14135/) (2023)
- [DeepEyes: Incentivizing "Thinking with Images" via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14362/) (2025)
- [Set-of-Mark Prompting Unleashes Extraordinary Visual Grounding in GPT-4V](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11441/) (2023)
- [Visual CoT: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models with a Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16999/) (2024)
- [Pixel Reasoner: Incentivizing Pixel-Space Reasoning with Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15966/) (2025)
- [Traceable Evidence Enhanced Visual Grounded Reasoning: Evaluation and Methodology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07999/) (2025)
- [Seeing but Not Believing: Probing the Disconnect Between Visual Attention and Answer Correctness in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17771/) (2025)
- [VLM-R3: Region Recognition, Reasoning, and Refinement for Enhanced Multimodal Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16192/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-OneVision-2: Towards Next-Generation Perceptual Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25979/) (2026)
- [DeFacto: Counterfactual Thinking with Images for Enforcing Evidence-Grounded and Faithful Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20912/) (2025)
- [CogFlow: Bridging Perception and Reasoning through Knowledge Internalization for Visual Mathematical Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01874/) (2026)
- [RegionReasoner: Region-Grounded Multi-Round Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03733/) (2026)
- [Compose and Fuse: Revisiting the Foundational Bottlenecks in Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23744/) (2025)
- [Evidence Integration in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.04290/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models increasingly reason through crops, regions, and tool-produced observations. Yet an observation can influence the answer without benefiting the candidate it supports. We study candidate-bound visual contribution: valid evidence should help, invalidating its supporting relation should remove its additional effect, and valid rebinding should redirect that effect to the newly supported candidate. We introduce CROSS-Bench, a benchmark of 28,000 decision problems, with matched invalidation and rebinding tests on a dedicated evaluation subset. Our RIVET interface preserves evidence identity and uncertainty, composes a candidate-conditioned response, and separately controls its strength. Shared-evidence experiments show that task accuracy and evidence ownership can diverge. Under matched capacity and training, RIVET increases normalized effect transfer from 0.512 to 0.651 where clean evidence has a positive effect. The advantage persists on common evaluation examples and across repeated decision-layer fits. With evidence predicted from raw inputs, RIVET improves CROSS-Bench accuracy by an average of 5.70 pp across four frozen backbones, relative to the same models without auxiliary evidence. These results separate the utility of visual evidence from the candidate-specific destination of its effect.