# Emo-Jev: Probabilistic Reasoning for Emotion Classification with Jev

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08829 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08829/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Audio-language model reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Audio-language model reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/audio-language-model-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12421/) (2020)
- [DialogueLLM: Context and Emotion Knowledge-Tuned Large Language Models for Emotion Recognition in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11374/) (2023)
- [JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26550/) (2026)
- [Pragmatic Metacognitive Prompting Improves LLM Performance on Sarcasm Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04509/) (2024)
- [RVISA: Reasoning and Verification for Implicit Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02340/) (2024)
- [Emo Pillars: Knowledge Distillation to Support Fine-Grained Context-Aware and Context-Less Emotion Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16856/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Jev offers an alternative interface for language understanding: given an input and predefined questions, it returns probabilistic decisions rather than free-form responses. Whether this interface can support effective reasoning for text classification against leading LLMs remains an open questions. We introduce Emo-Jev, a training-free framework with two complementary implementations. Emo-Jev-D decomposes classification into task-specific atomic judgments and composes their probabilities into a final prediction. Emo-Jev-SC constructs multiple judgment paths from complementary perspectives and aggregates their predictions into a consensus decision. We evaluate Emo-Jev on eight datasets spanning sentiment analysis, emotion recognition, sarcasm detection and humor detection, comparing against direct Jev classification and five SoTA LLMs under input/output and chain-of-thought reasoning. Standard Jev achieves 62.93% average macro-F1 versus 67.28% for the strongest LLM baseline, with lower observed latency and generally lower cost.