# STRUCTURALCOST: A controlled reading time dataset for modeling human sentence processing difficulty

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08208 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08208/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 3 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00752/) (2023)
- [On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.01912/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce STRUCTURALCOST, a self-paced reading dataset of 475 participants and 40,800 observations isolating the processing cost of long-distance subject-verb dependency resolution. We replicate a low-powered psycholinguistic finding at NLP scale, namely that human reading times at the main verb increase with dependency length, driven by syntactic embedding beyond linear distance. Different language models -- spanning n-gram models, SSMs, and transformers -- partially mirror this graded difficulty profile, yet underestimate the integration cost humans incur, with a gap that persists across architectures and model sizes. This suggests these models capture the predictive component of human processing but not the full integration cost that working memory imposes. STRUCTURALCOST provides data needed to drive progress toward evaluating the cognitive plausibility of language models.