# DSV-Mem: Evaluating Multimodal Memory in Professional Workflows for MLLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08102 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08102/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent memory systems](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-memory-systems/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08560/) (2023)
- [Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19413/) (2025)
- [LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10813/) (2024)
- [MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10250/) (2023)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [Gemma 4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02770/) (2026)
- [UI-TARS-2 Technical Report: Advancing GUI Agent with Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02544/) (2025)
- [LightMem: Lightweight and Efficient Memory-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18866/) (2025)
- [MIRIX: Multi-Agent Memory System for LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07957/) (2025)
- [SimpleMem: Efficient Lifelong Memory for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02553/) (2026)
- [Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24653/) (2026)
- [Mem-Gallery: Benchmarking Multimodal Long-Term Conversational Memory for MLLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03515/) (2026)
- [MemVerse: Multimodal Memory for Lifelong Learning Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.03627/) (2025)
- [LongMemEval-V2: Evaluating Long-Term Agent Memory Toward Experienced Colleagues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12493/) (2026)
- [Evaluating Long-Horizon Memory for Multi-Party Collaborative Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01313/) (2026)
- [MemEye: A Visual-Centric Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Agent Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15128/) (2026)
- [MemLens: Benchmarking Multimodal Long-Term Memory in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14906/) (2026)
- [WorldMemArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agent Memory Through Action-World Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29341/) (2026)
- [H2HMem: A Multimodal Memory Benchmark for Agents in Human-Human Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09461/) (2026)
- [M3Exam: Benchmarking Multimodal Memory for Realistic User-Agent Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07402/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational MLLM agents are increasingly expected to assist in professional workflows, from AI research and engineering design to product management and business operations. Yet this capability remains underexplored: existing benchmarks largely focus on informal, everyday interactions and personal-life scenarios featuring photographic natural images, isolated static artifacts, and recall-oriented questions. In contrast, professional scenarios often involve structured, information-heavy artifacts that undergo frequent revisions and authority updates, and compositional queries requiring reconciliation of many artifact versions while tracking state precisely. To address these challenges, we introduce DSV-Mem, a benchmark for evaluating Dense Stateful Visual Memory. DSV-Mem comprises expert-reviewed scenarios and 1,000 questions across five user-oriented categories (Current State, Past State, Derived State, Change History, and Conflict/Refusal). A Hartley-inspired criterion favors questions with broader visual-evidence inspection demands. We also introduce a generation harness that produces evaluation suites by decoupling state-transition synthesis from conversation filling. Evaluation over 27 configurations spanning frontier and open-weight models and memory management methods reveals that the strongest baseline scores below 45% on DSV-Mem. Analysis surfaces findings: 1) multimodality and information density both contribute to difficulty, but state evolution, particularly the number of governing updates, is the dominant tested factor. Raw conversation/haystack length, OCR, and arithmetic are not the primary bottlenecks; 2) models often fail to verify user premises against prior state updates before answering; 3) increased reasoning effort and memory management methods yield limited gains, whereas state-aware designs prove more effective. The benchmark and code will be publicly released.