# Nucleus Speculative Decoding: Plausibility-Aware Verification Beyond Exact Distribution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07822 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07822/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Speculative decoding, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving.
- Builds on 20 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Speculative decoding](https://mlsanity.com/inference/speculative-decoding/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.17192/) (2022)
- [Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01318/) (2023)
- [Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding Heads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10774/) (2024)
- [EAGLE: Speculative Sampling Requires Rethinking Feature Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15077/) (2024)
- [EAGLE-2: Faster Inference of Language Models with Dynamic Draft Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16858/) (2024)
- [Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19737/) (2024)
- [Blockwise Parallel Decoding for Deep Autoregressive Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03115/) (2018)
- [EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01840/) (2025)
- [DFlash: Block Diffusion for Flash Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06036/) (2026)
- [Judge Decoding: Faster Speculative Sampling Requires Going Beyond Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19309/) (2025)
- [Nemotron-Labs-Diffusion: A Tri-Mode Language Model Unifying Autoregressive, Diffusion, and Self-Speculation Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05722/) (2026)
- [Fuzzy Speculative Decoding for a Tunable Accuracy-Runtime Tradeoff](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20704/) (2025)
- [MARS: Unleashing the Power of Speculative Decoding via Margin-Aware Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15498/) (2026)
- [Cactus: Accelerating Auto-Regressive Decoding with Constrained Acceptance Speculative Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04987/) (2026)
- [JuDi: Revisiting Judge Decoding from First Principles via Training-Free Distributional Divergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04766/) (2026)
- [Margins, Not Windows: Training-Free Per-Step Lossy Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02897/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by using a lightweight draft model to propose multiple tokens that are verified by a target model in parallel. However, the standard acceptance rule focuses on exact distribution correction and rejects tokens that remain highly plausible under the target model when the draft model assigns excess probability. This conservative verification limits the number of draft tokens retained after each verification forward pass. We introduce Nucleus Speculative Decoding (NSD), a relaxed verification method that incorporates target-model plausibility into speculative decoding. NSD accepts a draft token if it satisfies the standard acceptance rule or belongs to the target model's nucleus. We theoretically characterize the distributional deviation introduced by our method and show that the single-step error is exactly determined by the draft model's excess probability within the target nucleus. We further derive sequence-level fidelity bounds that quantify how local deviations accumulate over autoregressive decoding. Experiments across multiple target models and proposal mechanisms demonstrate that NSD consistently improves speculative decoding efficiency while maintaining competitive task performance. Our method achieves throughput speedups of up to 5.16× over autoregressive decoding and up to 3.15× over standard speculative decoding. These improvements coincide with longer accepted lengths, allowing more output tokens to share the cost of each target verification pass. Analysis shows that plausibility-aware verification provides an effective approach for relaxed verification and speculative decoding efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/EIT-NLP/Nucleus-Speculative-Decoding.
