# RBMatch: Dual-Level Class Rebalancing for Semi-Supervised Building Footprint Extraction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07698 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07698/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 0 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate building footprint extraction from high-resolution remote sensing imagery is essential for urban planning, disaster response, and environmental monitoring. However, obtaining dense pixel-level annotations is costly, motivating the use of semi-supervised learning (SSL) to leverage unlabeled imagery. In remote sensing, severe foreground--background imbalance poses a particular challenge for self-training, as it can bias pseudo-label generation and the resulting unsupervised optimization toward the majority background class. We show that addressing this imbalance at only one stage is insufficient: balancing pseudo-label selection alone does not prevent background bias from re-emerging during unsupervised loss optimization, a failure mode we term imbalance leak. To address this issue, we propose RBMatch, a dual-level class-rebalancing framework that jointly regulates pseudo-label generation and unsupervised optimization. RBMatch combines a supervised learning pathway with a self-training module comprising three components: adaptive class-specific thresholding (ACT) for balanced pseudo-label selection, confidence-aware class-balanced reweighting (CACBR) for mitigating class bias in the unsupervised loss, and distribution alignment (DAL) for matching the predicted unlabeled-data distribution to the labeled-data prior. Experiments on the WHU, INRIA, and Massachusetts building footprint datasets across labeled ratios of 1%--10% show that RBMatch consistently achieves the best building IoU and F1-score among the evaluated methods. The improvement is most pronounced on the highly imbalanced Massachusetts dataset, where RBMatch improves IoU by 1.37 points over the strongest baseline at a 1% labeling ratio and is the only method to outperform the fully supervised baseline across all twelve dataset--ratio settings.