# SpecBraM: What Should an EEG Foundation Model Predict? Masked Band-Power Prediction versus Waveform Reconstruction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07484 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07484/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08544/) (2025)
- [Transformer-based Spatial-Temporal Feature Learning for EEG Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11170/) (2021)
- [NeuroLM: A Universal Multi-task Foundation Model for Bridging the Gap between Language and EEG Signals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00101/) (2024)
- [REVE: A Foundation Model for EEG -- Adapting to Any Setup with Large-Scale Pretraining on 25,000 Subjects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21585/) (2025)
- [Neuro-GPT: Towards A Foundation Model for EEG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03764/) (2023)
- [CSBrain: A Cross-scale Spatiotemporal Brain Foundation Model for EEG Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23075/) (2025)
- [BioSerenity-E1: a self-supervised EEG model for medical applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10362/) (2025)
- [BandVQ: Band-Wise Vector-Quantized EEG Foundation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24921/) (2026)
- [Understanding and Correcting Low-Frequency Bias in EEG Foundation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01898/) (2026)
- [MANAS-2: Constrained Reconstruction for EEG Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.13717/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised EEG models often reconstruct masked waveforms or predict discrete codes. We study a task-aligned alternative: masked band-power prediction (MBP), which predicts fixed narrow-band log spectral energy for masked channel-time patches. This target retains rhythm power relevant to sleep staging while avoiding phase-sensitive waveform reconstruction and a learned codebook. Across three pretraining seeds, we compare band-power and waveform targets with matched backbones, pretraining data (2,388 hours), and training steps, including a 2x2 tokenizer-by-target design. On ISRUC and HMC sleep staging, MBP exceeds raw- and band-waveform reconstruction by 1.6-2.8 balanced-accuracy points with all labels and 4.7-7.3 points with 1% of labels under a strict linear probe; the target effect exceeds the tokenizer effect. Its frozen features reach 0.7916/0.7425 balanced accuracy, versus 0.7636/0.7227 for a matched rich handcrafted spectral baseline, although the gap is about one point with 1% of labels. Full fine-tuning reaches 0.8107/0.7669. The gains do not extend to every task with spectral cues, including motor imagery, depression screening, and vigilance regression. These results support choosing pretraining targets to match the physical quantities and spatial and temporal scales relevant to downstream labels.