# Wiring Matters: Injection Topology and Initialization of Affordance Heads in Vision-Language-Action Policies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06318 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.06318/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models

## Abstract (arXiv)

Dense affordance supervision is an appealing auxiliary signal for vision-language-action (VLA) policies, yet naively co-training an affordance head can severely damage instruction following. We present a controlled study of how to wire such a head into a modern VLA on the LIBERO benchmark. Our recipe reads the backbone through a stop-gradient and re-injects an intermediate head feature into the action expert via a learned bridge. The stop-gradient is a precondition: letting affordance gradients reach the backbone drops the policy below the headless base (85.5% vs. 93.1%). With the backbone protected, a same-budget 2*2 ablation over injection topology (concatenation vs. residual) and bridge initialization (zero vs. random) shows initialization is the dominant lever. The best wiring, an actively initialized residual bridge, reaches 96.2%, matching the far more elaborate three-expert AffordanceVLA (95.8%) with under 1% extra parameters. Two probes explain the mechanism: ground-truth affordances fed as an input hurt, and inference-time zeroing shows a lazy bridge acts only as a training-time regularizer while an active bridge becomes load-bearing.